Hyundai Ioniq 5 N vs Mazda CX-6e
Biggest differences: Power — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 609 PS, Mazda CX-6e 258 PS · 0–100 km/h — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 3.4 s, Mazda CX-6e 7.9 s · Top speed — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 260 km/h, Mazda CX-6e 185 km/h.
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
High-performance D-segment electric crossover, offering 0-100 km/h acceleration in 3.4 s.
Mazda CX-6e
The Mazda CX-6e is a D-segment SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 484 km in the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging capabilities.
Profile against the market: Hyundai Ioniq 5 N vs Mazda CX-6e
Hyundai Ioniq 5 NN
Mazda CX-6eTakumi
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or Mazda CX-6e — who wins where
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMazda CX-6e +36 km
- Battery kWhHyundai Ioniq 5 N +6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMazda CX-6e −2.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSHyundai Ioniq 5 N +351 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sHyundai Ioniq 5 N −4.5 s
- Top speed km/hHyundai Ioniq 5 N +75 km/h
- DC charging kWHyundai Ioniq 5 N +44 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minHyundai Ioniq 5 N −6 min
- Weight ↓ kgMazda CX-6e −70 kg
- Boot lHyundai Ioniq 5 N +117 l
Technical data: Hyundai Ioniq 5 N vs Mazda CX-6e
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Hyundai Ioniq 5 N N | Mazda CX-6e Takumi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 448 km | 484 km | Mazda +36 km |
| Battery | 84 kWh | 78 kWh | Hyundai +6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 21.2 kWh/100 km | 18.9 kWh/100 km | Mazda −2.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 239 kW | 195 kW | Hyundai +44 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | 24 min | Hyundai −6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 17.4 km/min | 14.1 km/min | Hyundai +3.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Hyundai +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 609 PS | 258 PS | Hyundai +351 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 3.4 s | 7.9 s | Hyundai −4.5 s |
| Top speed | 260 km/h | 185 km/h | Hyundai +75 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2130 kg | Mazda −70 kg |
| Boot | 480 l | 363 l | Hyundai +117 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4715 mm | 4850 mm | Mazda +135 mm |
| Width | 1940 mm | 1935 mm | Hyundai +5 mm |
| Height | 1585 mm | 1620 mm | Mazda +35 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm | 2902 mm | Hyundai +98 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
Mazda CX-6e
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
Mazda CX-6e
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or Mazda CX-6e?
The Mazda CX-6e goes further: 484 km WLTP against the 448 km of the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N. That is a difference of 36 km.
Why does the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mazda CX-6e?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N carries 84 kWh and covers 448 km, while the Mazda CX-6e with its 78 kWh battery does 484 km. Energy use decides it: 21.2 against 18.9 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N and the Mazda CX-6e differ?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N has AWD and 609 PS. The Mazda CX-6e has RWD and 258 PS.
Which is more powerful — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or Mazda CX-6e?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is stronger: 609 PS against the 258 PS of the Mazda CX-6e. The gap is 351 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.