BYD Sealion 7 vs Mazda CX-6e

BYD Sealion 7 leads 8 to 1

Biggest differences: Power — BYD Sealion 7 530 PS, Mazda CX-6e 258 PS · 0–100 km/h — BYD Sealion 7 4.5 s, Mazda CX-6e 7.9 s · Boot — BYD Sealion 7 520 l, Mazda CX-6e 363 l.

BYD Sealion 7

BYD Sealion 7 is a D-segment SUV in three variants: WLTP range from 456 to 502 km, power from 312 to 530 hp.

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e is a D-segment SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 484 km in the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging capabilities.

Profile against the market: BYD Sealion 7 vs Mazda CX-6e

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Sealion 7 or Mazda CX-6e — who wins where

BYD Sealion 7 leads 8 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBYD Sealion 7 +18 km
    BYD Sealion 7
    502
    Mazda CX-6e
    484
  • Battery kWhBYD Sealion 7 +13.3 kWh
    BYD Sealion 7
    91.3
    Mazda CX-6e
    78
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBYD Sealion 7 −0.7 kWh/100 km
    BYD Sealion 7
    18.2
    Mazda CX-6e
    18.9
  • Power PSBYD Sealion 7 +272 PS
    BYD Sealion 7
    530
    Mazda CX-6e
    258
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBYD Sealion 7 −3.4 s
    BYD Sealion 7
    4.5
    Mazda CX-6e
    7.9
  • Top speed km/hBYD Sealion 7 +30 km/h
    BYD Sealion 7
    215
    Mazda CX-6e
    185
  • DC charging kWBYD Sealion 7 +35 kW
    BYD Sealion 7
    230
    Mazda CX-6e
    195
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Sealion 7
    11
    Mazda CX-6e
    11
  • Charging ↓ minNo difference
    BYD Sealion 7
    24
    Mazda CX-6e
    24
  • Weight ↓ kgMazda CX-6e −305 kg
    BYD Sealion 7
    2435
    Mazda CX-6e
    2130
  • Boot lBYD Sealion 7 +157 l
    BYD Sealion 7
    520
    Mazda CX-6e
    363

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Sealion 7 vs Mazda CX-6e

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Sealion 7 vs Mazda CX-6e
Key parameters BYD Sealion 7
Excellence AWD
Mazda CX-6e
Takumi
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range502 km484 kmBYD +18 km
Battery91.3 kWh78 kWhBYD +13.3 kWh
Consumption ↓18.2 kWh/100 km18.9 kWh/100 kmBYD −0.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging230 kW195 kWBYD +35 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓24 min24 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging14.6 km/min14.1 km/minBYD +0.5 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power530 PS258 PSBYD +272 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.5 s7.9 sBYD −3.4 s
Top speed215 km/h185 km/hBYD +30 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2435 kg2130 kgMazda −305 kg
Boot520 l363 lBYD +157 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Mazda
Length4830 mm4850 mmMazda +20 mm
Width—1935 mm—
Height—1620 mm—
Wheelbase2930 mm2902 mmBYD +28 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Sealion 7

Cost per 100 km5.46
Monthly68
Yearly819

Mazda CX-6e

Cost per 100 km5.67
Monthly71
Yearly850

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Sealion 7

Mazda CX-6e

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BYD Sealion 7 or Mazda CX-6e?

The BYD Sealion 7 goes further: 502 km WLTP against the 484 km of the Mazda CX-6e. That is a difference of 18 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BYD Sealion 7 and the Mazda CX-6e differ?

The BYD Sealion 7 has AWD and 530 PS. The Mazda CX-6e has RWD and 258 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Mazda CX-6e — its 78 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BYD Sealion 7, with 91.3 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — BYD Sealion 7 or Mazda CX-6e?

The BYD Sealion 7 is stronger: 530 PS against the 258 PS of the Mazda CX-6e. The gap is 272 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.