BYD Sealion 7 vs Mazda CX-6e
Biggest differences: Boot — BYD Sealion 7 520 l, Mazda CX-6e 363 l · Charging 10–80% — BYD Sealion 7 32 min, Mazda CX-6e 24 min · DC charging — BYD Sealion 7 150 kW, Mazda CX-6e 195 kW.
BYD Sealion 7
This electric SUV, belonging to the D-segment, offers two powertrain options with power ranging from 312 horsepower to 530 horsepower.
Mazda CX-6e
The Mazda CX-6e is a D-segment SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 484 km in the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging capabilities.
Profile against the market: BYD Sealion 7 vs Mazda CX-6e
BYD Sealion 7Comfort RWD
Mazda CX-6eTakumi
BYD Sealion 7 or Mazda CX-6e — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMazda CX-6e +2 km
- Battery kWhBYD Sealion 7 +4.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMazda CX-6e −1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBYD Sealion 7 +54 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBYD Sealion 7 −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hBYD Sealion 7 +30 km/h
- DC charging kWMazda CX-6e +45 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minMazda CX-6e −8 min
- Weight ↓ kgMazda CX-6e −95 kg
- Boot lBYD Sealion 7 +157 l
Technical data: BYD Sealion 7 vs Mazda CX-6e
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Sealion 7 Comfort RWD | Mazda CX-6e Takumi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 482 km | 484 km | Mazda +2 km |
| Battery | 82.5 kWh | 78 kWh | BYD +4.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.9 kWh/100 km | 18.9 kWh/100 km | Mazda −1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 195 kW | Mazda +45 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 32 min | 24 min | Mazda −8 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 10.5 km/min | 14.1 km/min | Mazda +3.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 312 PS | 258 PS | BYD +54 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 7.9 s | BYD −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h | 185 km/h | BYD +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2225 kg | 2130 kg | Mazda −95 kg |
| Boot | 520 l | 363 l | BYD +157 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4830 mm | 4850 mm | Mazda +20 mm |
| Width | 1925 mm | 1935 mm | Mazda +10 mm |
| Height | 1620 mm | 1620 mm | No difference |
| Wheelbase | 2930 mm | 2902 mm | BYD +28 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the BYD Sealion 7 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mazda CX-6e?
The BYD Sealion 7 carries 82.5 kWh and covers 482 km, while the Mazda CX-6e with its 78 kWh battery does 484 km. Energy use decides it: 19.9 against 18.9 kWh/100 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The BYD Sealion 7 takes more: 520 l against 363 l in the Mazda CX-6e. The difference is 157 l.
Which charges faster?
The BYD Sealion 7 accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Mazda CX-6e up to 195 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 32 and 24 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Mazda CX-6e uses less electricity: 18.9 kWh/100 km against 19.9 kWh/100 km in the BYD Sealion 7. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 150 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.