BMW iX4 vs Mazda CX-6e

BMW iX4 leads 9 to 1

Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX4 400 kW, Mazda CX-6e 195 kW · Power — BMW iX4 469 PS, Mazda CX-6e 258 PS · WLTP range — BMW iX4 828 km, Mazda CX-6e 484 km.

BMW iX4

The BMW iX4 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 374 to 469 horsepower, a range of up to 828 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 400 kW.

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e is a D-segment SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 484 km in the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging capabilities.

Profile against the market: BMW iX4 vs Mazda CX-6e

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX4 or Mazda CX-6e — who wins where

BMW iX4 leads 9 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX4 +344 km
    BMW iX4
    828
    Mazda CX-6e
    484
  • Battery kWhBMW iX4 +30.7 kWh
    BMW iX4
    108.7
    Mazda CX-6e
    78
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX4 −3.2 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX4
    15.7
    Mazda CX-6e
    18.9
  • Power PSBMW iX4 +211 PS
    BMW iX4
    469
    Mazda CX-6e
    258
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX4 −3 s
    BMW iX4
    4.9
    Mazda CX-6e
    7.9
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX4 +25 km/h
    BMW iX4
    210
    Mazda CX-6e
    185
  • DC charging kWBMW iX4 +205 kW
    BMW iX4
    400
    Mazda CX-6e
    195
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW iX4
    11
    Mazda CX-6e
    11
  • Charging ↓ minBMW iX4 −3 min
    BMW iX4
    21
    Mazda CX-6e
    24
  • Weight ↓ kgMazda CX-6e −175 kg
    BMW iX4
    2305
    Mazda CX-6e
    2130
  • Boot lBMW iX4 +127 l
    BMW iX4
    490
    Mazda CX-6e
    363

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Mazda CX-6e

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Mazda CX-6e
Key parameters BMW iX4
50 xDrive
Mazda CX-6e
Takumi
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range828 km484 kmBMW +344 km
Battery108.7 kWh78 kWhBMW +30.7 kWh
Consumption ↓15.7 kWh/100 km18.9 kWh/100 kmBMW −3.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging400 kW195 kWBMW +205 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓21 min24 minBMW −3 min
Range per minute of charging27.6 km/min14.1 km/minBMW +13.5 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VBMW +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power469 PS258 PSBMW +211 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.9 s7.9 sBMW −3 s
Top speed210 km/h185 km/hBMW +25 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2305 kg2130 kgMazda −175 kg
Boot490 l363 lBMW +127 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4782 mm4850 mmMazda +68 mm
Width1895 mm1935 mmMazda +40 mm
Height1595 mm1620 mmMazda +25 mm
Wheelbase2897 mm2902 mmMazda +5 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX4

Cost per 100 km4.71
Monthly59
Yearly707

Mazda CX-6e

Cost per 100 km5.67
Monthly71
Yearly850

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX4

Mazda CX-6e

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX4 or Mazda CX-6e?

The BMW iX4 goes further: 828 km WLTP against the 484 km of the Mazda CX-6e. That is a difference of 344 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX4 and the Mazda CX-6e differ?

The BMW iX4 has AWD and 469 PS. The Mazda CX-6e has RWD and 258 PS.

Which is more powerful — BMW iX4 or Mazda CX-6e?

The BMW iX4 is stronger: 469 PS against the 258 PS of the Mazda CX-6e. The gap is 211 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BMW iX4 takes more: 490 l against 363 l in the Mazda CX-6e. The difference is 127 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.