Ford e-Tourneo Courier vs Peugeot E-Rifter
Biggest differences: Boot — Ford e-Tourneo Courier 570 l, Peugeot E-Rifter 775 l · WLTP range — Ford e-Tourneo Courier 319 km, Peugeot E-Rifter 339 km.
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier is an electric van in the C segment, offering a range of 319 km according to the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging.
Peugeot E-Rifter
The Peugeot E-Rifter is a compact van with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 339 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Ford e-Tourneo Courier vs Peugeot E-Rifter
Ford e-Tourneo CourierTitanium 46 kWh
Peugeot E-Rifter50 kWh
Ford e-Tourneo Courier or Peugeot E-Rifter — who wins where
Peugeot E-Rifter leads 3 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot E-Rifter +20 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot E-Rifter +0.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord e-Tourneo Courier −0.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hNo data
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lPeugeot E-Rifter +205 l
Technical data: Ford e-Tourneo Courier vs Peugeot E-Rifter
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford e-Tourneo Courier Titanium 46 kWh | Peugeot E-Rifter 50 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 319 km | 339 km | Peugeot +20 km |
| Battery | 46 kWh | 46.3 kWh | Peugeot +0.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18 kWh/100 km | 18.3 kWh/100 km | Ford −0.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 26 min 10–80% | 30 min 0–80% | 4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.6 km/min | 9 km/min | Peugeot +0.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 136 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 11.5 s | — |
| Top speed | — | 132 km/h | — |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 1755 kg | — |
| Boot | 570 l | 775 l | Peugeot +205 l |
| Length | 4337 mm | 4405 mm | Peugeot +68 mm |
| Width | 1800 mm | 1848 mm | Peugeot +48 mm |
| Height | 1817 mm | 1818 mm | Peugeot +1 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm | 2785 mm | Peugeot +93 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
Peugeot E-Rifter
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
Peugeot E-Rifter
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford e-Tourneo Courier or Peugeot E-Rifter?
The Peugeot E-Rifter goes further: 339 km WLTP against the 319 km of the Ford e-Tourneo Courier. That is a difference of 20 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Peugeot E-Rifter takes more: 775 l against 570 l in the Ford e-Tourneo Courier. The difference is 205 l.
Which charges faster?
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Peugeot E-Rifter up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.