Ford e-Tourneo Courier vs Kia PV5
Biggest differences: Boot — Ford e-Tourneo Courier 570 l, Kia PV5 1330 l · Battery — Ford e-Tourneo Courier 46 kWh, Kia PV5 71.2 kWh · DC charging — Ford e-Tourneo Courier 100 kW, Kia PV5 150 kW.
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier is an electric van in the C segment, offering a range of 319 km according to the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging.
Kia PV5
The Kia PV5 is an electric van in the C-segment, offering two powertrain options with different battery capacities and power outputs.
Profile against the market: Ford e-Tourneo Courier vs Kia PV5
Ford e-Tourneo CourierTitanium 46 kWh
Kia PV5Passenger 71.2 kWh
Ford e-Tourneo Courier or Kia PV5 — who wins where
Kia PV5 leads 5 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmKia PV5 +93 km
- Battery kWhKia PV5 +25.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord e-Tourneo Courier −1.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSKia PV5 +27 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hNo data
- DC charging kWKia PV5 +50 kW
- AC charging kWFord e-Tourneo Courier +0.5 kW
- Charging ↓ minFord e-Tourneo Courier −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lKia PV5 +760 l
Technical data: Ford e-Tourneo Courier vs Kia PV5
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford e-Tourneo Courier Titanium 46 kWh | Kia PV5 Passenger 71.2 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 319 km | 412 km | Kia +93 km |
| Battery | 46 kWh | 71.2 kWh | Kia +25.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18 kWh/100 km | 19.3 kWh/100 km | Ford −1.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 150 kW | Kia +50 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 10.5 kW | Ford +0.5 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 26 min | 30 min | Ford −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.6 km/min | 9.6 km/min | Kia +1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 163 PS | Kia +27 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 10.6 s | — |
| Top speed | — | 135 km/h | — |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 2050 kg | — |
| Boot | 570 l | 1330 l | Kia +760 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Kia |
| Length | 4337 mm | 4695 mm | Kia +358 mm |
| Width | 1800 mm | 1895 mm | Kia +95 mm |
| Height | 1817 mm | 1923 mm | Kia +106 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm | 2995 mm | Kia +303 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
Kia PV5
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment C
Ford e-Tourneo Couriervs
Peugeot E-RifterFord e-Tourneo Couriervs
Toyota Proace City VersoFord e-Tourneo Couriervs
Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech ElectricKia PV5vs
Opel Combo ElectricKia PV5vsToyota Proace City VersoKia PV5vs
Volkswagen ID. BuzzKia PV5vs
Citroën ë-BerlingoKia PV5vsRenault Grand Kangoo E-Tech ElectricFrequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford e-Tourneo Courier or Kia PV5?
The Kia PV5 goes further: 412 km WLTP against the 319 km of the Ford e-Tourneo Courier. That is a difference of 93 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Kia PV5 — its 71.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Ford e-Tourneo Courier, with 46 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Kia PV5 takes more: 1330 l against 570 l in the Ford e-Tourneo Courier. The difference is 760 l.
Which charges faster?
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Kia PV5 up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 26 and 30 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.