Ford e-Tourneo Courier vs Toyota Proace City Verso
Biggest differences: Boot — Ford e-Tourneo Courier 570 l, Toyota Proace City Verso 210 l · Charging 10–80% — Ford e-Tourneo Courier 26 min, Toyota Proace City Verso 30 min · Battery — Ford e-Tourneo Courier 46 kWh, Toyota Proace City Verso 50 kWh.
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier is an electric van in the C segment, offering a range of 319 km according to the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging.
Toyota Proace City Verso
The Toyota Proace City Verso is a compact electric van with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 343 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Ford e-Tourneo Courier vs Toyota Proace City Verso
Ford e-Tourneo CourierTitanium 46 kWh
Toyota Proace City VersoL2 50 kWh
Ford e-Tourneo Courier or Toyota Proace City Verso — who wins where
Ford e-Tourneo Courier leads 3 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmToyota Proace City Verso +24 km
- Battery kWhToyota Proace City Verso +4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord e-Tourneo Courier −0.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hNo data
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minFord e-Tourneo Courier −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lFord e-Tourneo Courier +360 l
Technical data: Ford e-Tourneo Courier vs Toyota Proace City Verso
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford e-Tourneo Courier Titanium 46 kWh | Toyota Proace City Verso L2 50 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 319 km | 343 km | Toyota +24 km |
| Battery | 46 kWh | 50 kWh | Toyota +4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18 kWh/100 km | 18.1 kWh/100 km | Ford −0.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 26 min | 30 min | Ford −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.6 km/min | 8 km/min | Ford +0.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 136 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 11.2 s | — |
| Top speed | — | 135 km/h | — |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 1847 kg | — |
| Boot | 570 l | 210 l | Ford +360 l |
| Length | 4337 mm | 4751 mm | Toyota +414 mm |
| Width | 1800 mm | 1848 mm | Toyota +48 mm |
| Height | 1817 mm | 1818 mm | Toyota +1 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm | 2975 mm | Toyota +283 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
Toyota Proace City Verso
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
Toyota Proace City Verso
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment C
Ford e-Tourneo Couriervs
Peugeot E-RifterFord e-Tourneo Couriervs
Kia PV5Ford e-Tourneo Couriervs
Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech ElectricToyota Proace City Versovs
Citroën ë-BerlingoToyota Proace City Versovs
Opel Combo ElectricToyota Proace City VersovsKia PV5Toyota Proace City VersovsRenault Grand Kangoo E-Tech ElectricFrequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford e-Tourneo Courier or Toyota Proace City Verso?
The Toyota Proace City Verso goes further: 343 km WLTP against the 319 km of the Ford e-Tourneo Courier. That is a difference of 24 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier takes more: 570 l against 210 l in the Toyota Proace City Verso. The difference is 360 l.
Which charges faster?
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Toyota Proace City Verso up to 100 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 26 and 30 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.