Ford e-Tourneo Courier vs Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
Ford e-Tourneo Courier leads 6 to 1
Biggest differences: AC charging — Ford e-Tourneo Courier 11 kW, Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric 22 kW · DC charging — Ford e-Tourneo Courier 100 kW, Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric 80 kW · WLTP range — Ford e-Tourneo Courier 319 km, Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric 270 km.
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier is an electric van in the C segment, offering a range of 319 km according to the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging.
Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric is a seven-seat C-segment passenger van (MPV) with a 45 kWh battery and a WLTP range of 270 km.
Profile against the market: Ford e-Tourneo Courier vs Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
Ford e-Tourneo CourierTitanium 46 kWh
Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric45 kWh
Ford e-Tourneo Courier or Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric — who wins where
Ford e-Tourneo Courier leads 6 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmFord e-Tourneo Courier +49 km
- Battery kWhFord e-Tourneo Courier +1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord e-Tourneo Courier −2.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSFord e-Tourneo Courier +16 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hNo data
- DC charging kWFord e-Tourneo Courier +20 kW
- AC charging kWRenault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric +11 kW
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lFord e-Tourneo Courier +70 l
Technical data: Ford e-Tourneo Courier vs Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford e-Tourneo Courier Titanium 46 kWh | Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric 45 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 319 km | 270 km | Ford +49 km |
| Battery | 46 kWh | 45 kWh | Ford +1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18 kWh/100 km | 20.8 kWh/100 km | Ford −2.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 80 kW | Ford +20 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Renault +11 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 26 min 10–80% | 40 min 15–80% | 14 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.6 km/min | 4.4 km/min | Ford +4.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 120 PS | Ford +16 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 12.6 s | — |
| Top speed | — | 132 km/h | — |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 1979 kg | — |
| Boot | 570 l | 500 l | Ford +70 l |
| Length | 4337 mm | 4910 mm | Renault +573 mm |
| Width | 1800 mm | 1860 mm | Renault +60 mm |
| Height | 1817 mm | 1815 mm | Ford +2 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm | 3100 mm | Renault +408 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford e-Tourneo Courier
Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford e-Tourneo Courier or Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric?
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier goes further: 319 km WLTP against the 270 km of the Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric. That is a difference of 49 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier takes more: 570 l against 500 l in the Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric. The difference is 70 l.
Which charges faster?
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric up to 80 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Ford e-Tourneo Courier uses less electricity: 18 kWh/100 km against 20.8 kWh/100 km in the Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 420 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.