Peugeot E-Rifter vs Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
Biggest differences: AC charging — Peugeot E-Rifter 11 kW, Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric 22 kW · Boot — Peugeot E-Rifter 775 l, Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric 500 l · WLTP range — Peugeot E-Rifter 339 km, Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric 256 km.
Peugeot E-Rifter
The Peugeot E-Rifter is a compact van with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 339 kilometers.
Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
The Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric is an electric van in the C segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 256 km in the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: Peugeot E-Rifter vs Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
Peugeot E-Rifter or Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric — who wins where
Peugeot E-Rifter leads 8 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot E-Rifter +83 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot E-Rifter +1.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPeugeot E-Rifter −2.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPeugeot E-Rifter +16 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPeugeot E-Rifter −1.1 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWPeugeot E-Rifter +20 kW
- AC charging kWRenault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric +11 kW
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot E-Rifter −224 kg
- Boot lPeugeot E-Rifter +275 l
Technical data: Peugeot E-Rifter vs Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Peugeot E-Rifter50 kWh |  Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric45 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 339 km | 256 km | Peugeot +83 km |
| Battery | 46.3 kWh | 45 kWh | Peugeot +1.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.3 kWh/100 km | 20.8 kWh/100 km | Peugeot −2.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 80 kW | Peugeot +20 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Renault +11 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 30 min 0–80% | 40 min 15–80% | 10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9 km/min | 4.2 km/min | Peugeot +4.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 120 PS | Peugeot +16 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 11.5 s | 12.6 s | Peugeot −1.1 s |
| Top speed | 132 km/h | 132 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1755 kg | 1979 kg | Peugeot −224 kg |
| Boot | 775 l | 500 l | Peugeot +275 l |
| Length | 4405 mm | 4910 mm | Renault +505 mm |
| Width | 1848 mm | 1860 mm | Renault +12 mm |
| Height | 1818 mm | 1815 mm | Peugeot +3 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2785 mm | 3100 mm | Renault +315 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Peugeot E-Rifter
Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Peugeot E-Rifter
Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Peugeot E-Rifter or Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric?
The Peugeot E-Rifter goes further: 339 km WLTP against the 256 km of the Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric. That is a difference of 83 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Peugeot E-Rifter takes more: 775 l against 500 l in the Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric. The difference is 275 l.
Which charges faster?
The Peugeot E-Rifter accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric up to 80 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Peugeot E-Rifter uses less electricity: 18.3 kWh/100 km against 20.8 kWh/100 km in the Renault Grand Kangoo E-Tech Electric. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 375 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.