Kia PV5 vs Peugeot E-Rifter

Biggest differences: Boot — Kia PV5 1330 l, Peugeot E-Rifter 775 l · Battery — Kia PV5 71.2 kWh, Peugeot E-Rifter 46.3 kWh · DC charging — Kia PV5 150 kW, Peugeot E-Rifter 100 kW.

Kia PV5

The Kia PV5 is an electric van in the C-segment, offering two powertrain options with different battery capacities and power outputs.

Peugeot E-Rifter

The Peugeot E-Rifter is a compact van with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 339 kilometers.

Profile against the market: Kia PV5 vs Peugeot E-Rifter

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Kia PV5 or Peugeot E-Rifter — who wins where

Kia PV5 leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmKia PV5 +73 km
    Kia PV5
    412
    Peugeot E-Rifter
    339
  • Battery kWhKia PV5 +24.9 kWh
    Kia PV5
    71.2
    Peugeot E-Rifter
    46.3
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmPeugeot E-Rifter −1 kWh/100 km
    Kia PV5
    19.3
    Peugeot E-Rifter
    18.3
  • Power PSKia PV5 +27 PS
    Kia PV5
    163
    Peugeot E-Rifter
    136
  • 0–100 km/h sKia PV5 −0.9 s
    Kia PV5
    10.6
    Peugeot E-Rifter
    11.5
  • Top speed km/hKia PV5 +3 km/h
    Kia PV5
    135
    Peugeot E-Rifter
    132
  • DC charging kWKia PV5 +50 kW
    Kia PV5
    150
    Peugeot E-Rifter
    100
  • AC charging kWPeugeot E-Rifter +0.5 kW
    Kia PV5
    10.5
    Peugeot E-Rifter
    11
  • Weight kgPeugeot E-Rifter −295 kg
    Kia PV5
    2050
    Peugeot E-Rifter
    1755
  • Boot lKia PV5 +555 l
    Kia PV5
    1330
    Peugeot E-Rifter
    775

Add a third car

Technical data: Kia PV5 vs Peugeot E-Rifter

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Kia PV5 vs Peugeot E-Rifter
Key parameters Kia PV5
Passenger 71.2 kWh
Peugeot E-Rifter
50 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range412 km339 kmKia +73 km
Battery71.2 kWh46.3 kWhKia +24.9 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km18.3 kWh/100 kmPeugeot −1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW100 kWKia +50 kW
AC charging10.5 kW11 kWPeugeot +0.5 kW
Charging 30 min 10–80%30 min 0–80%No difference
Range per minute of charging9.6 km/min9 km/minKia +0.6 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power163 PS136 PSKia +27 PS
0–100 km/h10.6 s11.5 sKia −0.9 s
Top speed135 km/h132 km/hKia +3 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight2050 kg1755 kgPeugeot −295 kg
Boot1330 l775 lKia +555 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Kia
Length4695 mm4405 mmKia +290 mm
Width1895 mm1848 mmKia +47 mm
Height1923 mm1818 mmKia +105 mm
Wheelbase2995 mm2785 mmKia +210 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Kia PV5

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Peugeot E-Rifter

Cost per 100 km5.49
Monthly69
Yearly824

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Kia PV5

Peugeot E-Rifter

Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Kia PV5 or Peugeot E-Rifter?

The Kia PV5 goes further: 412 km WLTP against the 339 km of the Peugeot E-Rifter. That is a difference of 73 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Kia PV5 — its 71.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Peugeot E-Rifter, with 46.3 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Kia PV5 takes more: 1330 l against 775 l in the Peugeot E-Rifter. The difference is 555 l.

Which charges faster?

The Kia PV5 accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Peugeot E-Rifter up to 100 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.