Citroën ë-Berlingo vs Kia PV5

Biggest differences: Boot — Citroën ë-Berlingo 597 l, Kia PV5 1330 l · Battery — Citroën ë-Berlingo 46.3 kWh, Kia PV5 71.2 kWh · DC charging — Citroën ë-Berlingo 100 kW, Kia PV5 150 kW.

Citroën ë-Berlingo

The Citroën ë-Berlingo is a compact van with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 345 kilometers and a spacious cargo area.

Kia PV5

The Kia PV5 is an electric van in the C-segment, offering two powertrain options with different battery capacities and power outputs.

Profile against the market: Citroën ë-Berlingo vs Kia PV5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Citroën ë-Berlingo or Kia PV5 — who wins where

Kia PV5 leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmKia PV5 +67 km
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    345
    Kia PV5
    412
  • Battery kWhKia PV5 +24.9 kWh
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    46.3
    Kia PV5
    71.2
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmCitroën ë-Berlingo −1.8 kWh/100 km
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    17.5
    Kia PV5
    19.3
  • Power PSKia PV5 +27 PS
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    136
    Kia PV5
    163
  • 0–100 km/h sKia PV5 −1.1 s
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    11.7
    Kia PV5
    10.6
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    135
    Kia PV5
    135
  • DC charging kWKia PV5 +50 kW
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    100
    Kia PV5
    150
  • AC charging kWCitroën ë-Berlingo +0.5 kW
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    11
    Kia PV5
    10.5
  • Weight kgCitroën ë-Berlingo −295 kg
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    1755
    Kia PV5
    2050
  • Boot lKia PV5 +733 l
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    597
    Kia PV5
    1330

Add a third car

Technical data: Citroën ë-Berlingo vs Kia PV5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Citroën ë-Berlingo vs Kia PV5
Key parameters Citroën ë-Berlingo
50 kWh
Kia PV5
Passenger 71.2 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range345 km412 kmKia +67 km
Battery46.3 kWh71.2 kWhKia +24.9 kWh
Consumption17.5 kWh/100 km19.3 kWh/100 kmCitroën −1.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW150 kWKia +50 kW
AC charging11 kW10.5 kWCitroën +0.5 kW
Charging 30 min 0–80%30 min 10–80%No difference
Range per minute of charging9.2 km/min9.6 km/minKia +0.4 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power136 PS163 PSKia +27 PS
0–100 km/h11.7 s10.6 sKia −1.1 s
Top speed135 km/h135 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1755 kg2050 kgCitroën −295 kg
Boot597 l1330 lKia +733 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4410 mm4695 mmKia +285 mm
Width1848 mm1895 mmKia +47 mm
Height1775 mm1923 mmKia +148 mm
Wheelbase2785 mm2995 mmKia +210 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Citroën ë-Berlingo

Cost per 100 km5.25
Monthly66
Yearly788

Kia PV5

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Citroën ë-Berlingo

Kia PV5

Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Citroën ë-Berlingo or Kia PV5?

The Kia PV5 goes further: 412 km WLTP against the 345 km of the Citroën ë-Berlingo. That is a difference of 67 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Kia PV5 takes more: 1330 l against 597 l in the Citroën ë-Berlingo. The difference is 733 l.

Which charges faster?

The Citroën ë-Berlingo accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Kia PV5 up to 150 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Citroën ë-Berlingo uses less electricity: 17.5 kWh/100 km against 19.3 kWh/100 km in the Kia PV5. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 270 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.