Citroën ë-Berlingo vs Opel Combo Electric

Biggest differences: Consumption — Citroën ë-Berlingo 17.5 kWh/100 km, Opel Combo Electric 18 kWh/100 km.

Citroën ë-Berlingo

The Citroën ë-Berlingo is a compact van with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 345 kilometers and a spacious cargo area.

Opel Combo Electric

The Opel Combo Electric is a compact van with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 345 kilometers and a power output of 136 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Citroën ë-Berlingo vs Opel Combo Electric

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Citroën ë-Berlingo or Opel Combo Electric — who wins where

It's a tie: 1 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmNo difference
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    345
    Opel Combo Electric
    345
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    46.3
    Opel Combo Electric
    46.3
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmCitroën ë-Berlingo −0.5 kWh/100 km
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    17.5
    Opel Combo Electric
    18
  • Power PSNo difference
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    136
    Opel Combo Electric
    136
  • 0–100 km/h sNo difference
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    11.7
    Opel Combo Electric
    11.7
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    135
    Opel Combo Electric
    135
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    100
    Opel Combo Electric
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    11
    Opel Combo Electric
    11
  • Charging minNo difference
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    30
    Opel Combo Electric
    30
  • Weight kgOpel Combo Electric −19 kg
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    1755
    Opel Combo Electric
    1736
  • Boot lNo difference
    Citroën ë-Berlingo
    597
    Opel Combo Electric
    597

Add a third car

Technical data: Citroën ë-Berlingo vs Opel Combo Electric

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Citroën ë-Berlingo vs Opel Combo Electric
Key parameters Citroën ë-Berlingo
50 kWh
Opel Combo Electric
50 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range345 km345 kmNo difference
Battery46.3 kWh46.3 kWhNo difference
Consumption17.5 kWh/100 km18 kWh/100 kmCitroën −0.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW100 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 0–80%30 min30 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging9.2 km/min9.2 km/minNo difference
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power136 PS136 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h11.7 s11.7 sNo difference
Top speed135 km/h135 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1755 kg1736 kgOpel −19 kg
Boot597 l597 lNo difference
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4410 mm4410 mmNo difference
Width1848 mm1921 mmOpel +73 mm
Height1775 mm1812 mmOpel +37 mm
Wheelbase2785 mm2785 mmNo difference

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Citroën ë-Berlingo

Cost per 100 km5.25
Monthly66
Yearly788

Opel Combo Electric

Cost per 100 km5.4
Monthly67
Yearly810

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Citroën ë-Berlingo

Opel Combo Electric

Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which charges faster?

The Citroën ë-Berlingo accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Opel Combo Electric up to 100 kW. Charging from 0 to 80% takes 30 and 30 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Citroën ë-Berlingo uses less electricity: 17.5 kWh/100 km against 18 kWh/100 km in the Opel Combo Electric. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.