Citroën ë-Berlingo vs Toyota Proace City Verso
Biggest differences: Boot — Citroën ë-Berlingo 597 l, Toyota Proace City Verso 210 l · Battery — Citroën ë-Berlingo 46.3 kWh, Toyota Proace City Verso 50 kWh · Weight — Citroën ë-Berlingo 1755 kg, Toyota Proace City Verso 1847 kg.
Citroën ë-Berlingo
The Citroën ë-Berlingo is a compact van with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 345 kilometers and a spacious cargo area.
Toyota Proace City Verso
The Toyota Proace City Verso is a compact electric van with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 343 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Citroën ë-Berlingo vs Toyota Proace City Verso
Citroën ë-Berlingo50 kWh
Toyota Proace City VersoL2 50 kWh
Citroën ë-Berlingo or Toyota Proace City Verso — who wins where
Citroën ë-Berlingo leads 4 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmCitroën ë-Berlingo +2 km
- Battery kWhToyota Proace City Verso +3.7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmCitroën ë-Berlingo −0.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sToyota Proace City Verso −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgCitroën ë-Berlingo −92 kg
- Boot lCitroën ë-Berlingo +387 l
Technical data: Citroën ë-Berlingo vs Toyota Proace City Verso
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Citroën ë-Berlingo 50 kWh | Toyota Proace City Verso L2 50 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 345 km | 343 km | Citroën +2 km |
| Battery | 46.3 kWh | 50 kWh | Toyota +3.7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.5 kWh/100 km | 18.1 kWh/100 km | Citroën −0.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 30 min 0–80% | 30 min 10–80% | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.2 km/min | 8 km/min | Citroën +1.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 136 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 11.7 s | 11.2 s | Toyota −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 135 km/h | 135 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1755 kg | 1847 kg | Citroën −92 kg |
| Boot | 597 l | 210 l | Citroën +387 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Citroën |
| Length | 4410 mm | 4751 mm | Toyota +341 mm |
| Width | 1848 mm | 1848 mm | No difference |
| Height | 1775 mm | 1818 mm | Toyota +43 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2785 mm | 2975 mm | Toyota +190 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Citroën ë-Berlingo
Toyota Proace City Verso
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Citroën ë-Berlingo
Toyota Proace City Verso
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Toyota Proace City Verso have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Citroën ë-Berlingo?
The Toyota Proace City Verso carries 50 kWh and covers 343 km, while the Citroën ë-Berlingo with its 46.3 kWh battery does 345 km. Energy use decides it: 18.1 against 17.5 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Citroën ë-Berlingo — its 46.3 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Toyota Proace City Verso, with 50 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Citroën ë-Berlingo takes more: 597 l against 210 l in the Toyota Proace City Verso. The difference is 387 l.
Which charges faster?
The Citroën ë-Berlingo accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Toyota Proace City Verso up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.