Peugeot E-Rifter vs Toyota Proace City Verso
Biggest differences: Boot — Peugeot E-Rifter 775 l, Toyota Proace City Verso 210 l · Battery — Peugeot E-Rifter 46.3 kWh, Toyota Proace City Verso 50 kWh · Weight — Peugeot E-Rifter 1755 kg, Toyota Proace City Verso 1847 kg.
Peugeot E-Rifter
The Peugeot E-Rifter is a compact van with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 339 kilometers.
Toyota Proace City Verso
The Toyota Proace City Verso is a compact electric van with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 343 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Peugeot E-Rifter vs Toyota Proace City Verso
Peugeot E-Rifter50 kWh
Toyota Proace City VersoL2 50 kWh
Peugeot E-Rifter or Toyota Proace City Verso — who wins where
Toyota Proace City Verso leads 5 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmToyota Proace City Verso +4 km
- Battery kWhToyota Proace City Verso +3.7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota Proace City Verso −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sToyota Proace City Verso −0.3 s
- Top speed km/hToyota Proace City Verso +3 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgPeugeot E-Rifter −92 kg
- Boot lPeugeot E-Rifter +565 l
Technical data: Peugeot E-Rifter vs Toyota Proace City Verso
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Peugeot E-Rifter 50 kWh | Toyota Proace City Verso L2 50 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 339 km | 343 km | Toyota +4 km |
| Battery | 46.3 kWh | 50 kWh | Toyota +3.7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.3 kWh/100 km | 18.1 kWh/100 km | Toyota −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 30 min 0–80% | 30 min 10–80% | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 9 km/min | 8 km/min | Peugeot +1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 136 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 11.5 s | 11.2 s | Toyota −0.3 s |
| Top speed | 132 km/h | 135 km/h | Toyota +3 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1755 kg | 1847 kg | Peugeot −92 kg |
| Boot | 775 l | 210 l | Peugeot +565 l |
| Length | 4405 mm | 4751 mm | Toyota +346 mm |
| Width | 1848 mm | 1848 mm | No difference |
| Height | 1818 mm | 1818 mm | No difference |
| Wheelbase | 2785 mm | 2975 mm | Toyota +190 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Peugeot E-Rifter
Toyota Proace City Verso
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Peugeot E-Rifter
Toyota Proace City Verso
Other comparisons in this class: Van, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the bigger boot?
The Peugeot E-Rifter takes more: 775 l against 210 l in the Toyota Proace City Verso. The difference is 565 l.
Which charges faster?
The Peugeot E-Rifter accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Toyota Proace City Verso up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.