Exlantix ES vs Xpeng P7+
Biggest differences: DC charging — Exlantix ES 250 kW, Xpeng P7+ 446 kW · Power — Exlantix ES 480 PS, Xpeng P7+ 313 PS · 0–100 km/h — Exlantix ES 4.5 s, Xpeng P7+ 6.2 s.
Exlantix ES
The Exlantix ES is an electric sedan in the E-segment, featuring all-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 600 kilometers.
Xpeng P7+
An electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three drive variants with WLTP ranges of up to 530 km and fast charging (DC).
Profile against the market: Exlantix ES vs Xpeng P7+
- Exlantix ESLong Range AWD
Xpeng P7+Long Range RWD
Exlantix ES or Xpeng P7+ — who wins where
Exlantix ES leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmExlantix ES +70 km
- Battery kWhExlantix ES +7.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmExlantix ES −0.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSExlantix ES +167 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sExlantix ES −1.7 s
- Top speed km/hExlantix ES +10 km/h
- DC charging kWXpeng P7+ +196 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgExlantix ES −50 kg
- Boot lXpeng P7+ +123 l
Technical data: Exlantix ES vs Xpeng P7+
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Exlantix ES Long Range AWD | Xpeng P7+ Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 600 km | 530 km | Exlantix +70 km |
| Battery | 82 kWh | 74.9 kWh | Exlantix +7.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16 kWh/100 km | 16.4 kWh/100 km | Exlantix −0.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 250 kW | 446 kW | Xpeng +196 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 15 min 30–80% | 12 min 10–80% | 3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 20 km/min | 30.9 km/min | Xpeng +10.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 480 PS | 313 PS | Exlantix +167 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.5 s | 6.2 s | Exlantix −1.7 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h | Exlantix +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2050 kg | 2100 kg | Exlantix −50 kg |
| Boot | 450 l | 573 l | Xpeng +123 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Xpeng |
| Length | 4945 mm | 5071 mm | Xpeng +126 mm |
| Width | 1920 mm | 1937 mm | Xpeng +17 mm |
| Height | 1500 mm | 1512 mm | Xpeng +12 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2950 mm | 3000 mm | Xpeng +50 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Exlantix ES
Xpeng P7+
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Exlantix ES
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Exlantix ES or Xpeng P7+?
The Exlantix ES goes further: 600 km WLTP against the 530 km of the Xpeng P7+. That is a difference of 70 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Exlantix ES and the Xpeng P7+ differ?
The Exlantix ES has AWD and 480 PS. The Xpeng P7+ has RWD and 313 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Xpeng P7+ — its 74.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Exlantix ES, with 82 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Exlantix ES or Xpeng P7+?
The Exlantix ES is stronger: 480 PS against the 313 PS of the Xpeng P7+. The gap is 167 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.