Changan Deepal S05 vs Volvo EC40
Changan Deepal S05 leads 5 to 3
Biggest differences: Boot — Changan Deepal S05 492 l, Volvo EC40 404 l · Charging 10–80% — Changan Deepal S05 23 min, Volvo EC40 28 min · WLTP range — Changan Deepal S05 488 km, Volvo EC40 583 km.
Changan Deepal S05
Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in two variants: the RWD Max with a WLTP range of 488 km and the AWD Max with 435 hp.
Volvo EC40
The Volvo EC40 (C40 until 2024) is an electric C-segment crossover with drive on one or both axles and a WLTP range of up to 583 km.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S05 vs Volvo EC40
- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
Volvo EC40Single Motor Extended Range
Changan Deepal S05 or Volvo EC40 — who wins where
Changan Deepal S05 leads 5 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EC40 +95 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EC40 +13.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmChangan Deepal S05 −0.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSChangan Deepal S05 +20 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EC40 −0.2 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minChangan Deepal S05 −5 min
- Weight ↓ kgChangan Deepal S05 −80 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S05 +88 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs Volvo EC40
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Volvo EC40 Single Motor Extended Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 488 km | 583 km | Volvo +95 km |
| Battery | 68.8 kWh | 82 kWh | Volvo +13.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | Changan −0.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 200 kW | 200 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 23 min | 28 min | Changan −5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 14.6 km/min | Changan +0.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 252 PS | Changan +20 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 7.3 s | Volvo −0.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1940 kg | 2020 kg | Changan −80 kg |
| Boot | 492 l | 404 l | Changan +88 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Changan |
| Length | 4598 mm | 4440 mm | Changan +158 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1873 mm | Changan +27 mm |
| Height | 1600 mm | 1591 mm | Changan +9 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm | 2702 mm | Changan +178 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S05
Volvo EC40
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Volvo EC40
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S05 or Volvo EC40?
The Volvo EC40 goes further: 583 km WLTP against the 488 km of the Changan Deepal S05. That is a difference of 95 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S05 — its 68.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volvo EC40, with 82 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Changan Deepal S05 takes more: 492 l against 404 l in the Volvo EC40. The difference is 88 l.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S05 accepts up to 200 kW DC, the Volvo EC40 up to 200 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 23 and 28 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.