Changan Deepal S05 vs Renault Scenic
Changan Deepal S05 leads 5 to 4
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S05 200 kW, Renault Scenic 150 kW · WLTP range — Changan Deepal S05 488 km, Renault Scenic 642 km · Battery — Changan Deepal S05 68.8 kWh, Renault Scenic 89 kWh.
Changan Deepal S05
Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in two variants: the RWD Max with a WLTP range of 488 km and the AWD Max with 435 hp.
Renault Scenic
An electric SUV in the C segment, offering two battery options with a range of up to 642 km according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S05 vs Renault Scenic
- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
Renault ScenicLong Range 89 kWh
Changan Deepal S05 or Renault Scenic — who wins where
Changan Deepal S05 leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmRenault Scenic +154 km
- Battery kWhRenault Scenic +20.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmChangan Deepal S05 −0.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSChangan Deepal S05 +54 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sChangan Deepal S05 −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hChangan Deepal S05 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +50 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Scenic −29 kg
- Boot lRenault Scenic +53 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs Renault Scenic
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Renault Scenic Long Range 89 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 488 km | 642 km | Renault +154 km |
| Battery | 68.8 kWh | 89 kWh | Renault +20.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 16.8 kWh/100 km | Changan −0.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 200 kW | 150 kW | Changan +50 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 23 min 10–80% | 28 min 15–80% | 5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 14.9 km/min | No difference |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 218 PS | Changan +54 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 7.9 s | Changan −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Changan +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1940 kg | 1911 kg | Renault −29 kg |
| Boot | 492 l | 545 l | Renault +53 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4598 mm | 4470 mm | Changan +128 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1864 mm | Changan +36 mm |
| Height | 1600 mm | 1571 mm | Changan +29 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm | 2785 mm | Changan +95 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S05
Renault Scenic
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Renault Scenic
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S05 or Renault Scenic?
The Renault Scenic goes further: 642 km WLTP against the 488 km of the Changan Deepal S05. That is a difference of 154 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Changan Deepal S05 and the Renault Scenic differ?
The Changan Deepal S05 has RWD and 272 PS. The Renault Scenic has FWD and 218 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S05 accepts up to 200 kW DC, the Renault Scenic up to 150 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Changan Deepal S05 uses less electricity: 15.9 kWh/100 km against 16.8 kWh/100 km in the Renault Scenic. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 135 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.