Changan Deepal S05 vs Mercedes GLA EQ
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S05 168 kW, Mercedes GLA EQ 320 kW · WLTP range — Changan Deepal S05 488 km, Mercedes GLA EQ 657 km · Battery — Changan Deepal S05 68.8 kWh, Mercedes GLA EQ 85 kWh.
Changan Deepal S05
The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.
Mercedes GLA EQ
The Mercedes GLA EQ is an all-electric SUV in the compact segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S05 vs Mercedes GLA EQ
- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
Mercedes GLA EQ250+
Changan Deepal S05 or Mercedes GLA EQ — who wins where
Mercedes GLA EQ leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes GLA EQ +169 km
- Battery kWhMercedes GLA EQ +16.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes GLA EQ −0.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes GLA EQ −0.2 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes GLA EQ +30 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes GLA EQ +152 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minMercedes GLA EQ −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgChangan Deepal S05 −140 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S05 +82 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs Mercedes GLA EQ
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Mercedes GLA EQ250+ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 488 km | 657 km | Mercedes +169 km |
| Battery | 68.8 kWh | 85 kWh | Mercedes +16.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 15.1 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −0.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 168 kW | 320 kW | Mercedes +152 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 23 min | 22 min | Mercedes −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 20.9 km/min | Mercedes +6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Mercedes +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 272 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 7.3 s | Mercedes −0.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 210 km/h | Mercedes +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1940 kg | 2080 kg | Changan −140 kg |
| Boot | 492 l | 410 l | Changan +82 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Changan |
| Length | 4598 mm | 4565 mm | Changan +33 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1873 mm | Changan +27 mm |
| Height | 1600 mm | 1604 mm | Mercedes +4 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm | 2790 mm | Changan +90 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S05
Mercedes GLA EQ
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Mercedes GLA EQ
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S05 or Mercedes GLA EQ?
The Mercedes GLA EQ goes further: 657 km WLTP against the 488 km of the Changan Deepal S05. That is a difference of 169 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S05 — its 68.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes GLA EQ, with 85 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Changan Deepal S05 takes more: 492 l against 410 l in the Mercedes GLA EQ. The difference is 82 l.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S05 accepts up to 168 kW DC, the Mercedes GLA EQ up to 320 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 23 and 22 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.




