Cadillac Lyriq vs Xpeng G9L

Xpeng G9L leads 6 to 4

Biggest differences: DC charging — Cadillac Lyriq 190 kW, Xpeng G9L 540 kW · Charging 10–80% — Cadillac Lyriq 30 min, Xpeng G9L 12 min · Boot — Cadillac Lyriq 588 l, Xpeng G9L 935 l.

Cadillac Lyriq

Cadillac Lyriq is an E-segment SUV with all-wheel drive, in two variants: WLTP range from 471 to 530 km, power from 528 to 646 hp.

Xpeng G9L

The Xpeng G9L is a seven-seat E-segment SUV: a 110 kWh battery, a WLTP range of up to 591 km and 540 kW DC charging.

Profile against the market: Cadillac Lyriq vs Xpeng G9L

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Cadillac Lyriq or Xpeng G9L — who wins where

Xpeng G9L leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmXpeng G9L +61 km
    Cadillac Lyriq
    530
    Xpeng G9L
    591
  • Battery kWhXpeng G9L +8 kWh
    Cadillac Lyriq
    102
    Xpeng G9L
    110
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmXpeng G9L −1.4 kWh/100 km
    Cadillac Lyriq
    22.5
    Xpeng G9L
    21.1
  • Power PSCadillac Lyriq +161 PS
    Cadillac Lyriq
    528
    Xpeng G9L
    367
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sCadillac Lyriq −1.7 s
    Cadillac Lyriq
    5.3
    Xpeng G9L
    7
  • Top speed km/hCadillac Lyriq +10 km/h
    Cadillac Lyriq
    210
    Xpeng G9L
    200
  • DC charging kWXpeng G9L +350 kW
    Cadillac Lyriq
    190
    Xpeng G9L
    540
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Cadillac Lyriq
    11
    Xpeng G9L
    11
  • Charging ↓ minXpeng G9L −18 min
    Cadillac Lyriq
    30
    Xpeng G9L
    12
  • Weight ↓ kgCadillac Lyriq −20 kg
    Cadillac Lyriq
    2680
    Xpeng G9L
    2700
  • Boot lXpeng G9L +347 l
    Cadillac Lyriq
    588
    Xpeng G9L
    935

Add a third car

Technical data: Cadillac Lyriq vs Xpeng G9L

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Cadillac Lyriq vs Xpeng G9L
Key parameters Cadillac Lyriq
AWD
Xpeng G9L
RWD Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range530 km591 kmXpeng +61 km
Battery102 kWh110 kWhXpeng +8 kWh
Consumption ↓22.5 kWh/100 km21.1 kWh/100 kmXpeng −1.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging190 kW540 kWXpeng +350 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓30 min12 minXpeng −18 min
Range per minute of charging12.4 km/min34.5 km/minXpeng +22.1 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VXpeng +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power528 PS367 PSCadillac +161 PS
0–100 km/h ↓5.3 s7 sCadillac −1.7 s
Top speed210 km/h200 km/hCadillac +10 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2680 kg2700 kgCadillac −20 kg
Boot588 l935 lXpeng +347 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4996 mm5120 mmXpeng +124 mm
Width1977 mm1999 mmXpeng +22 mm
Height1623 mm1788 mmXpeng +165 mm
Wheelbase3094 mm3100 mmXpeng +6 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Cadillac Lyriq

Cost per 100 km6.75
Monthly84
Yearly1013

Xpeng G9L

Cost per 100 km6.33
Monthly79
Yearly950

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Cadillac Lyriq

Xpeng G9L

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Cadillac Lyriq or Xpeng G9L?

The Xpeng G9L goes further: 591 km WLTP against the 530 km of the Cadillac Lyriq. That is a difference of 61 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Cadillac Lyriq and the Xpeng G9L differ?

The Cadillac Lyriq has AWD and 528 PS. The Xpeng G9L has RWD and 367 PS.

Which is more powerful — Cadillac Lyriq or Xpeng G9L?

The Cadillac Lyriq is stronger: 528 PS against the 367 PS of the Xpeng G9L. The gap is 161 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Xpeng G9L takes more: 935 l against 588 l in the Cadillac Lyriq. The difference is 347 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.