BMW iX vs Cadillac Lyriq

Biggest differences: WLTP range — BMW iX 701 km, Cadillac Lyriq 530 km · Boot — BMW iX 500 l, Cadillac Lyriq 588 l · Charging 10–80% — BMW iX 35 min, Cadillac Lyriq 30 min.

BMW iX

An all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering all-wheel drive and a WLTP range of up to 701 kilometers.

Cadillac Lyriq

The Cadillac Lyriq is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering two versions of all-wheel drive (AWD) with different power outputs and ranges.

Profile against the market: BMW iX vs Cadillac Lyriq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX or Cadillac Lyriq — who wins where

BMW iX leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX +171 km
    BMW iX
    701
    Cadillac Lyriq
    530
  • Battery kWhBMW iX +7.1 kWh
    BMW iX
    109.1
    Cadillac Lyriq
    102
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBMW iX −0.6 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX
    21.9
    Cadillac Lyriq
    22.5
  • Power PSBMW iX +16 PS
    BMW iX
    544
    Cadillac Lyriq
    528
  • 0–100 km/h sBMW iX −0.7 s
    BMW iX
    4.6
    Cadillac Lyriq
    5.3
  • Top speed km/hCadillac Lyriq +10 km/h
    BMW iX
    200
    Cadillac Lyriq
    210
  • DC charging kWBMW iX +5 kW
    BMW iX
    195
    Cadillac Lyriq
    190
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW iX
    11
    Cadillac Lyriq
    11
  • Charging minCadillac Lyriq −5 min
    BMW iX
    35
    Cadillac Lyriq
    30
  • Weight kgBMW iX −175 kg
    BMW iX
    2505
    Cadillac Lyriq
    2680
  • Boot lCadillac Lyriq +88 l
    BMW iX
    500
    Cadillac Lyriq
    588

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX vs Cadillac Lyriq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX vs Cadillac Lyriq
Key parameters BMW iX
xDrive60
Cadillac Lyriq
AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range701 km530 kmBMW +171 km
Battery109.1 kWh102 kWhBMW +7.1 kWh
Consumption21.9 kWh/100 km22.5 kWh/100 kmBMW −0.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging195 kW190 kWBMW +5 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%35 min30 minCadillac −5 min
Range per minute of charging14 km/min12.4 km/minBMW +1.6 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power544 PS528 PSBMW +16 PS
0–100 km/h4.6 s5.3 sBMW −0.7 s
Top speed200 km/h210 km/hCadillac +10 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2505 kg2680 kgBMW −175 kg
Boot500 l588 lCadillac +88 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Cadillac
Length4965 mm4996 mmCadillac +31 mm
Width1970 mm1977 mmCadillac +7 mm
Height1695 mm1623 mmBMW +72 mm
Wheelbase3000 mm3094 mmCadillac +94 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX

Cost per 100 km6.57
Monthly82
Yearly985

Cadillac Lyriq

Cost per 100 km6.75
Monthly84
Yearly1013

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX

Cadillac Lyriq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX or Cadillac Lyriq?

The BMW iX goes further: 701 km WLTP against the 530 km of the Cadillac Lyriq. That is a difference of 171 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Cadillac Lyriq — its 102 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX, with 109.1 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Cadillac Lyriq takes more: 588 l against 500 l in the BMW iX. The difference is 88 l.

Which charges faster?

The BMW iX accepts up to 195 kW DC, the Cadillac Lyriq up to 190 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 35 and 30 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.