Cadillac Lyriq vs Nio EL8

Biggest differences: Boot — Cadillac Lyriq 588 l, Nio EL8 265 l · Charging 10–80% — Cadillac Lyriq 30 min, Nio EL8 20 min · 0–100 km/h — Cadillac Lyriq 5.3 s, Nio EL8 4.1 s.

Cadillac Lyriq

The Cadillac Lyriq is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering two versions of all-wheel drive (AWD) with different power outputs and ranges.

Nio EL8

The Nio EL8 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering a high power output of 653 horsepower and all-wheel drive, available with two battery configurations.

Profile against the market: Cadillac Lyriq vs Nio EL8

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Cadillac Lyriq or Nio EL8 — who wins where

Nio EL8 leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmCadillac Lyriq +20 km
    Cadillac Lyriq
    530
    Nio EL8
    510
  • Battery kWhCadillac Lyriq +2 kWh
    Cadillac Lyriq
    102
    Nio EL8
    100
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmNio EL8 −1.3 kWh/100 km
    Cadillac Lyriq
    22.5
    Nio EL8
    21.2
  • Power PSNio EL8 +125 PS
    Cadillac Lyriq
    528
    Nio EL8
    653
  • 0–100 km/h sNio EL8 −1.2 s
    Cadillac Lyriq
    5.3
    Nio EL8
    4.1
  • Top speed km/hCadillac Lyriq +10 km/h
    Cadillac Lyriq
    210
    Nio EL8
    200
  • DC charging kWNio EL8 +50 kW
    Cadillac Lyriq
    190
    Nio EL8
    240
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Cadillac Lyriq
    11
    Nio EL8
    11
  • Charging minNio EL8 −10 min
    Cadillac Lyriq
    30
    Nio EL8
    20
  • Weight kgNio EL8 −122 kg
    Cadillac Lyriq
    2680
    Nio EL8
    2558
  • Boot lCadillac Lyriq +323 l
    Cadillac Lyriq
    588
    Nio EL8
    265

Add a third car

Technical data: Cadillac Lyriq vs Nio EL8

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Cadillac Lyriq vs Nio EL8
Key parameters Cadillac Lyriq
AWD
Nio EL8
100 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range530 km510 kmCadillac +20 km
Battery102 kWh100 kWhCadillac +2 kWh
Consumption22.5 kWh/100 km21.2 kWh/100 kmNio −1.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging190 kW240 kWNio +50 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%30 min20 minNio −10 min
Range per minute of charging12.4 km/min17.9 km/minNio +5.5 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power528 PS653 PSNio +125 PS
0–100 km/h5.3 s4.1 sNio −1.2 s
Top speed210 km/h200 km/hCadillac +10 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2680 kg2558 kgNio −122 kg
Boot588 l265 lCadillac +323 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4996 mm5099 mmNio +103 mm
Width1977 mm1989 mmNio +12 mm
Height1623 mm1750 mmNio +127 mm
Wheelbase3094 mm3070 mmCadillac +24 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Cadillac Lyriq

Cost per 100 km6.75
Monthly84
Yearly1013

Nio EL8

Cost per 100 km6.36
Monthly79
Yearly954

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Cadillac Lyriq

Nio EL8

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Cadillac Lyriq or Nio EL8?

The Cadillac Lyriq goes further: 530 km WLTP against the 510 km of the Nio EL8. That is a difference of 20 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Cadillac Lyriq takes more: 588 l against 265 l in the Nio EL8. The difference is 323 l.

Which charges faster?

The Cadillac Lyriq accepts up to 190 kW DC, the Nio EL8 up to 240 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 20 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Nio EL8 uses less electricity: 21.2 kWh/100 km against 22.5 kWh/100 km in the Cadillac Lyriq. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 195 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.