Cadillac Lyriq vs Nio EL8
Biggest differences: Boot — Cadillac Lyriq 588 l, Nio EL8 265 l · Charging 10–80% — Cadillac Lyriq 30 min, Nio EL8 20 min · 0–100 km/h — Cadillac Lyriq 5.3 s, Nio EL8 4.1 s.
Cadillac Lyriq
The Cadillac Lyriq is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering two versions of all-wheel drive (AWD) with different power outputs and ranges.
Nio EL8
The Nio EL8 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering a high power output of 653 horsepower and all-wheel drive, available with two battery configurations.
Profile against the market: Cadillac Lyriq vs Nio EL8
Cadillac LyriqAWD
Nio EL8100 kWh
Cadillac Lyriq or Nio EL8 — who wins where
Nio EL8 leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmCadillac Lyriq +20 km
- Battery kWhCadillac Lyriq +2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNio EL8 −1.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNio EL8 +125 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNio EL8 −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hCadillac Lyriq +10 km/h
- DC charging kWNio EL8 +50 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNio EL8 −10 min
- Weight ↓ kgNio EL8 −122 kg
- Boot lCadillac Lyriq +323 l
Technical data: Cadillac Lyriq vs Nio EL8
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Cadillac LyriqAWD | Nio EL8100 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 530 km | 510 km | Cadillac +20 km |
| Battery | 102 kWh | 100 kWh | Cadillac +2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 22.5 kWh/100 km | 21.2 kWh/100 km | Nio −1.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 190 kW | 240 kW | Nio +50 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 30 min | 20 min | Nio −10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12.4 km/min | 17.9 km/min | Nio +5.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 528 PS | 653 PS | Nio +125 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5.3 s | 4.1 s | Nio −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h | Cadillac +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2680 kg | 2558 kg | Nio −122 kg |
| Boot | 588 l | 265 l | Cadillac +323 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4996 mm | 5099 mm | Nio +103 mm |
| Width | 1977 mm | 1989 mm | Nio +12 mm |
| Height | 1623 mm | 1750 mm | Nio +127 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3094 mm | 3070 mm | Cadillac +24 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Cadillac Lyriq
Nio EL8
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Cadillac Lyriq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Cadillac Lyriq or Nio EL8?
The Cadillac Lyriq goes further: 530 km WLTP against the 510 km of the Nio EL8. That is a difference of 20 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Cadillac Lyriq takes more: 588 l against 265 l in the Nio EL8. The difference is 323 l.
Which charges faster?
The Cadillac Lyriq accepts up to 190 kW DC, the Nio EL8 up to 240 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 20 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Nio EL8 uses less electricity: 21.2 kWh/100 km against 22.5 kWh/100 km in the Cadillac Lyriq. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 195 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.



