Nio EL8 vs Xpeng G9L

Xpeng G9L leads 6 to 3

Biggest differences: Boot — Nio EL8 265 l, Xpeng G9L 935 l · DC charging — Nio EL8 240 kW, Xpeng G9L 540 kW · Power — Nio EL8 653 PS, Xpeng G9L 367 PS.

Nio EL8

The Nio EL8 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering a high power output of 653 horsepower and all-wheel drive, available with two battery configurations.

Xpeng G9L

The Xpeng G9L is a seven-seat E-segment SUV: a 110 kWh battery, a WLTP range of up to 591 km and 540 kW DC charging.

Profile against the market: Nio EL8 vs Xpeng G9L

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Nio EL8 or Xpeng G9L — who wins where

Xpeng G9L leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmXpeng G9L +81 km
    Nio EL8
    510
    Xpeng G9L
    591
  • Battery kWhXpeng G9L +10 kWh
    Nio EL8
    100
    Xpeng G9L
    110
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmXpeng G9L −0.1 kWh/100 km
    Nio EL8
    21.2
    Xpeng G9L
    21.1
  • Power PSNio EL8 +286 PS
    Nio EL8
    653
    Xpeng G9L
    367
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sNio EL8 −2.9 s
    Nio EL8
    4.1
    Xpeng G9L
    7
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Nio EL8
    200
    Xpeng G9L
    200
  • DC charging kWXpeng G9L +300 kW
    Nio EL8
    240
    Xpeng G9L
    540
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Nio EL8
    11
    Xpeng G9L
    11
  • Charging ↓ minXpeng G9L −8 min
    Nio EL8
    20
    Xpeng G9L
    12
  • Weight ↓ kgNio EL8 −142 kg
    Nio EL8
    2558
    Xpeng G9L
    2700
  • Boot lXpeng G9L +670 l
    Nio EL8
    265
    Xpeng G9L
    935

Add a third car

Technical data: Nio EL8 vs Xpeng G9L

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Nio EL8 vs Xpeng G9L
Key parameters Nio EL8
100 kWh
Xpeng G9L
RWD Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range510 km591 kmXpeng +81 km
Battery100 kWh110 kWhXpeng +10 kWh
Consumption ↓21.2 kWh/100 km21.1 kWh/100 kmXpeng −0.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging240 kW540 kWXpeng +300 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓20 min12 minXpeng −8 min
Range per minute of charging17.9 km/min34.5 km/minXpeng +16.6 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VXpeng +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power653 PS367 PSNio +286 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.1 s7 sNio −2.9 s
Top speed200 km/h200 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2558 kg2700 kgNio −142 kg
Boot265 l935 lXpeng +670 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length5099 mm5120 mmXpeng +21 mm
Width1989 mm1999 mmXpeng +10 mm
Height1750 mm1788 mmXpeng +38 mm
Wheelbase3070 mm3100 mmXpeng +30 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Nio EL8

Cost per 100 km6.36
Monthly79
Yearly954

Xpeng G9L

Cost per 100 km6.33
Monthly79
Yearly950

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Nio EL8

Xpeng G9L

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Nio EL8 or Xpeng G9L?

The Xpeng G9L goes further: 591 km WLTP against the 510 km of the Nio EL8. That is a difference of 81 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Nio EL8 and the Xpeng G9L differ?

The Nio EL8 has AWD and 653 PS. The Xpeng G9L has RWD and 367 PS.

Which is more powerful — Nio EL8 or Xpeng G9L?

The Nio EL8 is stronger: 653 PS against the 367 PS of the Xpeng G9L. The gap is 286 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Xpeng G9L takes more: 935 l against 265 l in the Nio EL8. The difference is 670 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.