BYD Tang vs Cadillac Lyriq
Biggest differences: Boot — BYD Tang 235 l, Cadillac Lyriq 588 l · Charging 10–80% — BYD Tang 46 min, Cadillac Lyriq 30 min · DC charging — BYD Tang 170 kW, Cadillac Lyriq 190 kW.
BYD Tang
An electric SUV in the E-segment, featuring a powerful engine.
Cadillac Lyriq
The Cadillac Lyriq is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering two versions of all-wheel drive (AWD) with different power outputs and ranges.
Profile against the market: BYD Tang vs Cadillac Lyriq
BYD TangFlagship
Cadillac LyriqAWD
BYD Tang or Cadillac Lyriq — who wins where
Cadillac Lyriq leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNo difference
- Battery kWhBYD Tang +6.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmCadillac Lyriq −1.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSCadillac Lyriq +11 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBYD Tang −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hCadillac Lyriq +20 km/h
- DC charging kWCadillac Lyriq +20 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minCadillac Lyriq −16 min
- Weight ↓ kgBYD Tang −50 kg
- Boot lCadillac Lyriq +353 l
Technical data: BYD Tang vs Cadillac Lyriq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Tang Flagship | Cadillac Lyriq AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 530 km | 530 km | No difference |
| Battery | 108.8 kWh | 102 kWh | BYD +6.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 24 kWh/100 km | 22.5 kWh/100 km | Cadillac −1.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 170 kW | 190 kW | Cadillac +20 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 46 min | 30 min | Cadillac −16 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.1 km/min | 12.4 km/min | Cadillac +4.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 517 PS | 528 PS | Cadillac +11 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.9 s | 5.3 s | BYD −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 190 km/h | 210 km/h | Cadillac +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2630 kg | 2680 kg | BYD −50 kg |
| Boot | 235 l | 588 l | Cadillac +353 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4970 mm | 4996 mm | Cadillac +26 mm |
| Width | 1955 mm | 1977 mm | Cadillac +22 mm |
| Height | 1745 mm | 1623 mm | BYD +122 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2820 mm | 3094 mm | Cadillac +274 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Tang
Cadillac Lyriq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Cadillac Lyriq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the bigger boot?
The Cadillac Lyriq takes more: 588 l against 235 l in the BYD Tang. The difference is 353 l.
Which charges faster?
The BYD Tang accepts up to 170 kW DC, the Cadillac Lyriq up to 190 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 46 and 30 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Cadillac Lyriq uses less electricity: 22.5 kWh/100 km against 24 kWh/100 km in the BYD Tang. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 225 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.