BYD Tang vs Xpeng G9L
Xpeng G9L leads 7 to 3
Biggest differences: Boot — BYD Tang 235 l, Xpeng G9L 935 l · Charging 10–80% — BYD Tang 46 min, Xpeng G9L 12 min · DC charging — BYD Tang 170 kW, Xpeng G9L 540 kW.
BYD Tang
An electric SUV in the E-segment, featuring a powerful engine.
Xpeng G9L
The Xpeng G9L is a seven-seat E-segment SUV: a 110 kWh battery, a WLTP range of up to 591 km and 540 kW DC charging.
Profile against the market: BYD Tang vs Xpeng G9L
BYD Tang or Xpeng G9L — who wins where
Xpeng G9L leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmXpeng G9L +61 km
- Battery kWhXpeng G9L +1.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmXpeng G9L −2.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBYD Tang +150 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBYD Tang −2.1 s
- Top speed km/hXpeng G9L +10 km/h
- DC charging kWXpeng G9L +370 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minXpeng G9L −34 min
- Weight ↓ kgBYD Tang −70 kg
- Boot lXpeng G9L +700 l
Technical data: BYD Tang vs Xpeng G9L
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  BYD TangFlagship |  Xpeng G9LRWD Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 530 km | 591 km | Xpeng +61 km |
| Battery | 108.8 kWh | 110 kWh | Xpeng +1.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 24 kWh/100 km | 21.1 kWh/100 km | Xpeng −2.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 170 kW | 540 kW | Xpeng +370 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 46 min | 12 min | Xpeng −34 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.1 km/min | 34.5 km/min | Xpeng +26.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Xpeng +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 517 PS | 367 PS | BYD +150 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.9 s | 7 s | BYD −2.1 s |
| Top speed | 190 km/h | 200 km/h | Xpeng +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2630 kg | 2700 kg | BYD −70 kg |
| Boot | 235 l | 935 l | Xpeng +700 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4970 mm | 5120 mm | Xpeng +150 mm |
| Width | 1955 mm | 1999 mm | Xpeng +44 mm |
| Height | 1745 mm | 1788 mm | Xpeng +43 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2820 mm | 3100 mm | Xpeng +280 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Tang
Xpeng G9L
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Xpeng G9L
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BYD Tang or Xpeng G9L?
The Xpeng G9L goes further: 591 km WLTP against the 530 km of the BYD Tang. That is a difference of 61 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BYD Tang and the Xpeng G9L differ?
The BYD Tang has AWD and 517 PS. The Xpeng G9L has RWD and 367 PS.
Which is more powerful — BYD Tang or Xpeng G9L?
The BYD Tang is stronger: 517 PS against the 367 PS of the Xpeng G9L. The gap is 150 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Xpeng G9L takes more: 935 l against 235 l in the BYD Tang. The difference is 700 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.