BYD Atto 3 vs SERES 3

Biggest differences: Power — BYD Atto 3 313 PS, SERES 3 160 PS · WLTP range — BYD Atto 3 510 km, SERES 3 300 km · 0–100 km/h — BYD Atto 3 5.5 s, SERES 3 8.9 s.

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an SUV in the C segment, offering three different configurations of power output and range according to the WLTP standard.

SERES 3

The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.

Profile against the market: BYD Atto 3 vs SERES 3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Atto 3 or SERES 3 — who wins where

BYD Atto 3 leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBYD Atto 3 +210 km
    BYD Atto 3
    510
    SERES 3
    300
  • Battery kWhBYD Atto 3 +20.8 kWh
    BYD Atto 3
    74.8
    SERES 3
    54
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBYD Atto 3 −1.2 kWh/100 km
    BYD Atto 3
    16.4
    SERES 3
    17.6
  • Power PSBYD Atto 3 +153 PS
    BYD Atto 3
    313
    SERES 3
    160
  • 0–100 km/h sBYD Atto 3 −3.4 s
    BYD Atto 3
    5.5
    SERES 3
    8.9
  • Top speed km/hBYD Atto 3 +25 km/h
    BYD Atto 3
    180
    SERES 3
    155
  • DC charging kWNo data
    BYD Atto 3
    220
    SERES 3
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Atto 3
    11
    SERES 3
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    BYD Atto 3
    25
    SERES 3
  • Weight kgSERES 3 −115 kg
    BYD Atto 3
    1880
    SERES 3
    1765
  • Boot lBYD Atto 3 +172 l
    BYD Atto 3
    490
    SERES 3
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Atto 3 vs SERES 3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Atto 3 vs SERES 3
Key parameters BYD Atto 3
Design
SERES 3
Standard
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range510 km300 kmBYD +210 km
Battery74.8 kWh54 kWhBYD +20.8 kWh
Consumption16.4 kWh/100 km17.6 kWh/100 kmBYD −1.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging220 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%25 min
Range per minute of charging14.3 km/min
Voltage800 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power313 PS160 PSBYD +153 PS
0–100 km/h5.5 s8.9 sBYD −3.4 s
Top speed180 km/h155 km/hBYD +25 km/h
DrivetrainRWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1880 kg1765 kgSERES −115 kg
Boot490 l318 lBYD +172 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly BYD
Length4455 mm4415 mmBYD +40 mm
Width1875 mm1850 mmBYD +25 mm
Height1615 mm1650 mmSERES +35 mm
Wheelbase2720 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Atto 3

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

SERES 3

Cost per 100 km5.28
Monthly66
Yearly792

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Atto 3

SERES 3

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 3 or SERES 3?

The BYD Atto 3 goes further: 510 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 210 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BYD Atto 3 and the SERES 3 differ?

The BYD Atto 3 has RWD and 313 PS. The SERES 3 has FWD and 160 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the BYD Atto 3 — its 74.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The SERES 3, with 54 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — BYD Atto 3 or SERES 3?

The BYD Atto 3 is stronger: 313 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 153 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.