BYD Atto 2 vs BYD Atto 3

Biggest differences: Power — BYD Atto 2 204 PS, BYD Atto 3 313 PS · 0–100 km/h — BYD Atto 2 7.9 s, BYD Atto 3 5.5 s · DC charging — BYD Atto 2 155 kW, BYD Atto 3 220 kW.

BYD Atto 2

This electric SUV, belonging to the C-segment, offers two different powertrain options with varying battery capacities and maximum power outputs.

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an SUV in the C segment, offering three different configurations of power output and range according to the WLTP standard.

Profile against the market: BYD Atto 2 vs BYD Atto 3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Atto 2 or BYD Atto 3 — who wins where

BYD Atto 3 leads 8 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBYD Atto 3 +80 km
    BYD Atto 2
    430
    BYD Atto 3
    510
  • Battery kWhBYD Atto 3 +10 kWh
    BYD Atto 2
    64.8
    BYD Atto 3
    74.8
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBYD Atto 3 −1 kWh/100 km
    BYD Atto 2
    17.4
    BYD Atto 3
    16.4
  • Power PSBYD Atto 3 +109 PS
    BYD Atto 2
    204
    BYD Atto 3
    313
  • 0–100 km/h sBYD Atto 3 −2.4 s
    BYD Atto 2
    7.9
    BYD Atto 3
    5.5
  • Top speed km/hBYD Atto 3 +20 km/h
    BYD Atto 2
    160
    BYD Atto 3
    180
  • DC charging kWBYD Atto 3 +65 kW
    BYD Atto 2
    155
    BYD Atto 3
    220
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Atto 2
    11
    BYD Atto 3
    11
  • Charging minNo difference
    BYD Atto 2
    25
    BYD Atto 3
    25
  • Weight kgBYD Atto 2 −160 kg
    BYD Atto 2
    1720
    BYD Atto 3
    1880
  • Boot lBYD Atto 3 +40 l
    BYD Atto 2
    450
    BYD Atto 3
    490

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Atto 2 vs BYD Atto 3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Atto 2 vs BYD Atto 3
Key parameters BYD Atto 2
Comfort
BYD Atto 3
Design
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range430 km510 kmBYD +80 km
Battery64.8 kWh74.8 kWhBYD +10 kWh
Consumption17.4 kWh/100 km16.4 kWh/100 kmBYD −1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging155 kW220 kWBYD +65 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%25 min25 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging12 km/min14.3 km/minBYD +2.3 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VBYD +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS313 PSBYD +109 PS
0–100 km/h7.9 s5.5 sBYD −2.4 s
Top speed160 km/h180 km/hBYD +20 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1720 kg1880 kgBYD −160 kg
Boot450 l490 lBYD +40 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4310 mm4455 mmBYD +145 mm
Width1830 mm1875 mmBYD +45 mm
Height1675 mm1615 mmBYD +60 mm
Wheelbase2620 mm2720 mmBYD +100 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Atto 2

Cost per 100 km5.22
Monthly65
Yearly783

BYD Atto 3

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Atto 2

BYD Atto 3

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 2 or BYD Atto 3?

The BYD Atto 3 goes further: 510 km WLTP against the 430 km of the BYD Atto 2. That is a difference of 80 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BYD Atto 2 and the BYD Atto 3 differ?

The BYD Atto 2 has FWD and 204 PS. The BYD Atto 3 has RWD and 313 PS.

Which is more powerful — BYD Atto 2 or BYD Atto 3?

The BYD Atto 3 is stronger: 313 PS against the 204 PS of the BYD Atto 2. The gap is 109 PS.

Which charges faster?

The BYD Atto 2 accepts up to 155 kW DC, the BYD Atto 3 up to 220 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 25 and 25 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.