BMW iX5 vs Xpeng G9

BMW iX5 leads 7 to 4

Biggest differences: AC charging — BMW iX5 22 kW, Xpeng G9 11 kW · Charging 10–80% — BMW iX5 23 min, Xpeng G9 12 min · Power — BMW iX5 578 PS, Xpeng G9 351 PS.

BMW iX5

The BMW iX5 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers 578 horsepower, a range of up to 845 km according to the WLTP standard, and supports DC fast charging up to 460 kW.

Xpeng G9

An electric SUV in the E segment, offering three different drive options, with the most powerful version accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 4.2 seconds.

Profile against the market: BMW iX5 vs Xpeng G9

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX5 or Xpeng G9 — who wins where

BMW iX5 leads 7 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX5 +260 km
    BMW iX5
    845
    Xpeng G9
    585
  • Battery kWhBMW iX5 +48.8 kWh
    BMW iX5
    141
    Xpeng G9
    92.2
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmXpeng G9 −1.5 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX5
    20.1
    Xpeng G9
    18.6
  • Power PSBMW iX5 +227 PS
    BMW iX5
    578
    Xpeng G9
    351
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX5 −1.8 s
    BMW iX5
    4.6
    Xpeng G9
    6.4
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX5 +10 km/h
    BMW iX5
    210
    Xpeng G9
    200
  • DC charging kWBMW iX5 +15 kW
    BMW iX5
    460
    Xpeng G9
    445
  • AC charging kWBMW iX5 +11 kW
    BMW iX5
    22
    Xpeng G9
    11
  • Charging ↓ minXpeng G9 −11 min
    BMW iX5
    23
    Xpeng G9
    12
  • Weight ↓ kgXpeng G9 −535 kg
    BMW iX5
    2825
    Xpeng G9
    2290
  • Boot lXpeng G9 +5 l
    BMW iX5
    655
    Xpeng G9
    660

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX5 vs Xpeng G9

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX5 vs Xpeng G9
Key parameters BMW iX5
60 xDrive
Xpeng G9
RWD Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range845 km585 kmBMW +260 km
Battery141 kWh92.2 kWhBMW +48.8 kWh
Consumption ↓20.1 kWh/100 km18.6 kWh/100 kmXpeng −1.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging460 kW445 kWBMW +15 kW
AC charging22 kW11 kWBMW +11 kW
Charging 10–80% ↓23 min12 minXpeng −11 min
Range per minute of charging25.7 km/min34.1 km/minXpeng +8.4 km/min
Voltage800 V800 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power578 PS351 PSBMW +227 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.6 s6.4 sBMW −1.8 s
Top speed210 km/h200 km/hBMW +10 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2825 kg2290 kgXpeng −535 kg
Boot655 l660 lXpeng +5 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Xpeng
Length4994 mm4891 mmBMW +103 mm
Width2000 mm1937 mmBMW +63 mm
Height1748 mm1680 mmBMW +68 mm
Wheelbase3035 mm2998 mmBMW +37 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX5

Cost per 100 km6.03
Monthly75
Yearly905

Xpeng G9

Cost per 100 km5.58
Monthly70
Yearly837

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX5

Xpeng G9

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX5 or Xpeng G9?

The BMW iX5 goes further: 845 km WLTP against the 585 km of the Xpeng G9. That is a difference of 260 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX5 and the Xpeng G9 differ?

The BMW iX5 has AWD and 578 PS. The Xpeng G9 has RWD and 351 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Xpeng G9 — its 92.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX5, with 141 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — BMW iX5 or Xpeng G9?

The BMW iX5 is stronger: 578 PS against the 351 PS of the Xpeng G9. The gap is 227 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.