BMW iX5 vs Kia EV9

BMW iX5 leads 10 to 1

Biggest differences: Power — BMW iX5 578 PS, Kia EV9 204 PS · DC charging — BMW iX5 460 kW, Kia EV9 210 kW · 0–100 km/h — BMW iX5 4.6 s, Kia EV9 9.4 s.

BMW iX5

The BMW iX5 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers 578 horsepower, a range of up to 845 km according to the WLTP standard, and supports DC fast charging up to 460 kW.

Kia EV9

The Kia EV9 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering four different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges.

Profile against the market: BMW iX5 vs Kia EV9

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX5 or Kia EV9 — who wins where

BMW iX5 leads 10 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX5 +282 km
    BMW iX5
    845
    Kia EV9
    563
  • Battery kWhBMW iX5 +41.2 kWh
    BMW iX5
    141
    Kia EV9
    99.8
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX5 −0.1 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX5
    20.1
    Kia EV9
    20.2
  • Power PSBMW iX5 +374 PS
    BMW iX5
    578
    Kia EV9
    204
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX5 −4.8 s
    BMW iX5
    4.6
    Kia EV9
    9.4
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX5 +25 km/h
    BMW iX5
    210
    Kia EV9
    185
  • DC charging kWBMW iX5 +250 kW
    BMW iX5
    460
    Kia EV9
    210
  • AC charging kWBMW iX5 +11 kW
    BMW iX5
    22
    Kia EV9
    11
  • Charging ↓ minBMW iX5 −1 min
    BMW iX5
    23
    Kia EV9
    24
  • Weight ↓ kgKia EV9 −399 kg
    BMW iX5
    2825
    Kia EV9
    2426
  • Boot lBMW iX5 +322 l
    BMW iX5
    655
    Kia EV9
    333

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX5 vs Kia EV9

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX5 vs Kia EV9
Key parameters BMW iX5
60 xDrive
Kia EV9
99.8 kWh RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range845 km563 kmBMW +282 km
Battery141 kWh99.8 kWhBMW +41.2 kWh
Consumption ↓20.1 kWh/100 km20.2 kWh/100 kmBMW −0.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging460 kW210 kWBMW +250 kW
AC charging22 kW11 kWBMW +11 kW
Charging 10–80% ↓23 min24 minBMW −1 min
Range per minute of charging25.7 km/min16.4 km/minBMW +9.3 km/min
Voltage800 V800 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power578 PS204 PSBMW +374 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.6 s9.4 sBMW −4.8 s
Top speed210 km/h185 km/hBMW +25 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2825 kg2426 kgKia −399 kg
Boot655 l333 lBMW +322 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Kia
Length4994 mm5010 mmKia +16 mm
Width2000 mm1980 mmBMW +20 mm
Height1748 mm1755 mmKia +7 mm
Wheelbase3035 mm3100 mmKia +65 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX5

Cost per 100 km6.03
Monthly75
Yearly905

Kia EV9

Cost per 100 km6.06
Monthly76
Yearly909

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX5

Kia EV9

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX5 or Kia EV9?

The BMW iX5 goes further: 845 km WLTP against the 563 km of the Kia EV9. That is a difference of 282 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX5 and the Kia EV9 differ?

The BMW iX5 has AWD and 578 PS. The Kia EV9 has RWD and 204 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Kia EV9 — its 99.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX5, with 141 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — BMW iX5 or Kia EV9?

The BMW iX5 is stronger: 578 PS against the 204 PS of the Kia EV9. The gap is 374 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.