BMW iX5 vs Volvo EX90
BMW iX5 leads 8 to 3
Biggest differences: Boot — BMW iX5 655 l, Volvo EX90 324 l · AC charging — BMW iX5 22 kW, Volvo EX90 11 kW · WLTP range — BMW iX5 845 km, Volvo EX90 625 km.
BMW iX5
The BMW iX5 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers 578 horsepower, a range of up to 845 km according to the WLTP standard, and supports DC fast charging up to 460 kW.
Volvo EX90
The Volvo EX90 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 333 horsepower to 680 horsepower.
Profile against the market: BMW iX5 vs Volvo EX90
BMW iX560 xDrive
Volvo EX90Twin Motor
BMW iX5 or Volvo EX90 — who wins where
BMW iX5 leads 8 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX5 +220 km
- Battery kWhBMW iX5 +35 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolvo EX90 −0.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBMW iX5 +122 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX5 −0.9 s
- Top speed km/hBMW iX5 +30 km/h
- DC charging kWBMW iX5 +110 kW
- AC charging kWBMW iX5 +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX90 −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgVolvo EX90 −135 kg
- Boot lBMW iX5 +331 l
Technical data: BMW iX5 vs Volvo EX90
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX5 60 xDrive | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 845 km | 625 km | BMW +220 km |
| Battery | 141 kWh | 106 kWh | BMW +35 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 20.1 kWh/100 km | 19.4 kWh/100 km | Volvo −0.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 460 kW | 350 kW | BMW +110 kW |
| AC charging | 22 kW | 11 kW | BMW +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 23 min | 22 min | Volvo −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 25.7 km/min | 19.9 km/min | BMW +5.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 578 PS | 456 PS | BMW +122 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.6 s | 5.5 s | BMW −0.9 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | BMW +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2825 kg | 2690 kg | Volvo −135 kg |
| Boot | 655 l | 324 l | BMW +331 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Volvo |
| Length | 4994 mm | 5037 mm | Volvo +43 mm |
| Width | 2000 mm | 1964 mm | BMW +36 mm |
| Height | 1748 mm | 1744 mm | BMW +4 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3035 mm | 2985 mm | BMW +50 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX5
Volvo EX90
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Volvo EX90
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX5 or Volvo EX90?
The BMW iX5 goes further: 845 km WLTP against the 625 km of the Volvo EX90. That is a difference of 220 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volvo EX90 — its 106 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX5, with 141 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The BMW iX5 takes more: 655 l against 324 l in the Volvo EX90. The difference is 331 l.
Which charges faster?
The BMW iX5 accepts up to 460 kW DC, the Volvo EX90 up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 23 and 22 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.