Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs KGM Torres EVX
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, KGM Torres EVX 50 kW · Boot — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 511 l, KGM Torres EVX 839 l · Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, KGM Torres EVX 207 PS.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
KGM Torres EVX
The KGM Torres EVX is a compact SUV with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of 462 km thanks to its 73.4 kWh battery.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs KGM Torres EVX
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
KGM Torres EVXTorres EVX
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or KGM Torres EVX — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 7 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +217 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +21.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −2.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +99 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −1.5 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +35 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +220 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgKGM Torres EVX −285 kg
- Boot lKGM Torres EVX +328 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs KGM Torres EVX
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | KGM Torres EVX Torres EVX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 462 km | Audi +217 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 73.4 kWh | Audi +21.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 17.7 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 50 kW | Audi +220 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Audi +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 207 PS | Audi +99 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 8.11 s | Audi −1.5 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 175 km/h | Audi +35 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 1915 kg | KGM −285 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 839 l | KGM +328 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only KGM |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4715 mm | Audi +56 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1890 mm | Audi +49 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1725 mm | KGM +114 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2680 mm | Audi +213 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
KGM Torres EVX
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
KGM Torres EVX
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or KGM Torres EVX?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 462 km of the KGM Torres EVX. That is a difference of 217 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and the KGM Torres EVX differ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The KGM Torres EVX has FWD and 207 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the KGM Torres EVX — its 73.4 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or KGM Torres EVX?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is stronger: 306 PS against the 207 PS of the KGM Torres EVX. The gap is 99 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.