Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Elaris BEO
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Elaris BEO 100 kW · Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, Elaris BEO 204 PS · Top speed — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 210 km/h, Elaris BEO 150 km/h.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Elaris BEO
The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Elaris BEO
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance- Elaris BEOStandard
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Elaris BEO — who wins where
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron leads 7 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +190 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +8.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +102 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +60 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +170 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgElaris BEO −245 kg
- Boot lAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +44 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Elaris BEO
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Elaris BEO Standard | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 489 km | Audi +190 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 86 kWh | Audi +8.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 19.3 kWh/100 km | Audi −4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 100 kW | Audi +170 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 22 min 10–80% | 45 min 20–80% | 23 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 6.5 km/min | Audi +15.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 204 PS | Audi +102 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | — | — |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 150 km/h | Audi +60 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 1955 kg | Elaris −245 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 467 l | Audi +44 l |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4698 mm | Audi +73 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1908 mm | Audi +31 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1696 mm | Elaris +85 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2800 mm | Audi +93 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Elaris BEO
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Elaris BEO
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Elaris BEO?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 190 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and the Elaris BEO differ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Elaris BEO?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is stronger: 306 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 102 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Elaris BEO up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.