Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Volvo EX60
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 11 kW, Volvo EX60 22 kW · Power — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 306 PS, Volvo EX60 510 PS · DC charging — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron 270 kW, Volvo EX60 400 kW.
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron is a D-segment crossover offering four powertrain variants with power ranging from 252 hp to 489 hp.
Volvo EX60
The Volvo EX60 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering two different powertrain options with varying power outputs and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Volvo EX60
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tronQ6 Sportback e-tron performance
Volvo EX60P10 AWD
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Volvo EX60 — who wins where
Volvo EX60 leads 7 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +19 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX60 +0.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −0.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX60 +204 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX60 −2 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron +30 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX60 +130 kW
- AC charging kWVolvo EX60 +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX60 −6 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron −75 kg
- Boot lVolvo EX60 +12 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Volvo EX60
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron Q6 Sportback e-tron performance | Volvo EX60 P10 AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 679 km | 660 km | Audi +19 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 95 kWh | Volvo +0.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | Audi −0.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 400 kW | Volvo +130 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Volvo +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 16 min | Volvo −6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.6 km/min | 28.9 km/min | Volvo +7.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 510 PS | Volvo +204 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 4.6 s | Volvo −2 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Audi +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2275 kg | Audi −75 kg |
| Boot | 511 l | 523 l | Volvo +12 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Volvo |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4803 mm | Volvo +32 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1908 mm | Audi +31 mm |
| Height | 1611 mm | 1635 mm | Volvo +24 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2970 mm | Volvo +77 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Volvo EX60
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Volvo EX60
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron or Volvo EX60?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron goes further: 679 km WLTP against the 660 km of the Volvo EX60. That is a difference of 19 km.
Why does the Volvo EX60 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron?
The Volvo EX60 carries 95 kWh and covers 660 km, while the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron with its 94.9 kWh battery does 679 km. Energy use decides it: 16.2 against 15.3 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron and the Volvo EX60 differ?
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The Volvo EX60 has AWD and 510 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volvo EX60 — its 95 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.