Elaris BEO vs Volvo EX60

Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Volvo EX60 400 kW · Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Volvo EX60 510 PS · AC charging — Elaris BEO 11 kW, Volvo EX60 22 kW.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Volvo EX60

The Volvo EX60 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering two different powertrain options with varying power outputs and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Volvo EX60

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or Volvo EX60 — who wins where

Volvo EX60 leads 8 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVolvo EX60 +171 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    Volvo EX60
    660
  • Battery kWhVolvo EX60 +9 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    Volvo EX60
    95
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmVolvo EX60 −3.1 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    Volvo EX60
    16.2
  • Power PSVolvo EX60 +306 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    Volvo EX60
    510
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    Volvo EX60
    4.6
  • Top speed km/hVolvo EX60 +30 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    Volvo EX60
    180
  • DC charging kWVolvo EX60 +300 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    Volvo EX60
    400
  • AC charging kWVolvo EX60 +11 kW
    Elaris BEO
    11
    Volvo EX60
    22
  • Weight kgElaris BEO −320 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    Volvo EX60
    2275
  • Boot lVolvo EX60 +56 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    Volvo EX60
    523

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Volvo EX60

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Volvo EX60
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
Volvo EX60
P10 AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km660 kmVolvo +171 km
Battery86 kWh95 kWhVolvo +9 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km16.2 kWh/100 kmVolvo −3.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW400 kWVolvo +300 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWVolvo +11 kW
Charging 45 min 20–80%16 min 10–80%29 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min28.9 km/minVolvo +22.4 km/min
Voltage800 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS510 PSVolvo +306 PS
0–100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed150 km/h180 km/hVolvo +30 km/h
DrivetrainFWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1955 kg2275 kgElaris −320 kg
Boot467 l523 lVolvo +56 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Volvo
Length4698 mm4803 mmVolvo +105 mm
Width1908 mm1908 mmNo difference
Height1696 mm1635 mmElaris +61 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2970 mmVolvo +170 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Volvo EX60

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

Volvo EX60

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Volvo EX60?

The Volvo EX60 goes further: 660 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 171 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Volvo EX60 differ?

The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Volvo EX60 has AWD and 510 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Volvo EX60 — its 95 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Elaris BEO or Volvo EX60?

The Volvo EX60 is stronger: 510 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 306 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.