Hyundai Ioniq 5 N vs KGM Torres EVX
Biggest differences: DC charging — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 239 kW, KGM Torres EVX 50 kW · Power — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 609 PS, KGM Torres EVX 207 PS · 0–100 km/h — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 3.4 s, KGM Torres EVX 8.11 s.
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
High-performance D-segment electric crossover, offering 0-100 km/h acceleration in 3.4 s.
KGM Torres EVX
The KGM Torres EVX is a compact SUV with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of 462 km thanks to its 73.4 kWh battery.
Profile against the market: Hyundai Ioniq 5 N vs KGM Torres EVX
Hyundai Ioniq 5 NN
KGM Torres EVXTorres EVX
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or KGM Torres EVX — who wins where
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N leads 5 to 4
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmKGM Torres EVX +14 km
- Battery kWhHyundai Ioniq 5 N +10.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmKGM Torres EVX −3.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSHyundai Ioniq 5 N +402 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sHyundai Ioniq 5 N −4.7 s
- Top speed km/hHyundai Ioniq 5 N +85 km/h
- DC charging kWHyundai Ioniq 5 N +189 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgKGM Torres EVX −285 kg
- Boot lKGM Torres EVX +359 l
Technical data: Hyundai Ioniq 5 N vs KGM Torres EVX
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Hyundai Ioniq 5 N N | KGM Torres EVX Torres EVX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 448 km | 462 km | KGM +14 km |
| Battery | 84 kWh | 73.4 kWh | Hyundai +10.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 21.2 kWh/100 km | 17.7 kWh/100 km | KGM −3.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 239 kW | 50 kW | Hyundai +189 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 17.4 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Hyundai +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 609 PS | 207 PS | Hyundai +402 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 3.4 s | 8.11 s | Hyundai −4.7 s |
| Top speed | 260 km/h | 175 km/h | Hyundai +85 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 1915 kg | KGM −285 kg |
| Boot | 480 l | 839 l | KGM +359 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4715 mm | 4715 mm | No difference |
| Width | 1940 mm | 1890 mm | Hyundai +50 mm |
| Height | 1585 mm | 1725 mm | KGM +140 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm | 2680 mm | Hyundai +320 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
KGM Torres EVX
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
KGM Torres EVX
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or KGM Torres EVX?
The KGM Torres EVX goes further: 462 km WLTP against the 448 km of the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N. That is a difference of 14 km.
Why does the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the KGM Torres EVX?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N carries 84 kWh and covers 448 km, while the KGM Torres EVX with its 73.4 kWh battery does 462 km. Energy use decides it: 21.2 against 17.7 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N and the KGM Torres EVX differ?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N has AWD and 609 PS. The KGM Torres EVX has FWD and 207 PS.
Which is more powerful — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or KGM Torres EVX?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is stronger: 609 PS against the 207 PS of the KGM Torres EVX. The gap is 402 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.