Hyundai Ioniq 5 N vs Leapmotor C10
Biggest differences: Power — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 609 PS, Leapmotor C10 299 PS · 0–100 km/h — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 3.4 s, Leapmotor C10 6.2 s · Top speed — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N 260 km/h, Leapmotor C10 190 km/h.
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
High-performance D-segment electric crossover, offering 0-100 km/h acceleration in 3.4 s.
Leapmotor C10
The Leapmotor C10 is an SUV in the D segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and performance specifications.
Profile against the market: Hyundai Ioniq 5 N vs Leapmotor C10
Hyundai Ioniq 5 NN
Leapmotor C10Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh)
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or Leapmotor C10 — who wins where
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N leads 5 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLeapmotor C10 +62 km
- Battery kWhHyundai Ioniq 5 N +2.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLeapmotor C10 −3.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSHyundai Ioniq 5 N +310 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sHyundai Ioniq 5 N −2.8 s
- Top speed km/hHyundai Ioniq 5 N +70 km/h
- DC charging kWHyundai Ioniq 5 N +59 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Hyundai Ioniq 5 N vs Leapmotor C10
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Hyundai Ioniq 5 N N | Leapmotor C10 Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 448 km | 510 km | Leapmotor +62 km |
| Battery | 84 kWh | 81.9 kWh | Hyundai +2.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 21.2 kWh/100 km | 18 kWh/100 km | Leapmotor −3.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 239 kW | 180 kW | Hyundai +59 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 18 min 10–80% | 22 min 30–80% | 4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 17.4 km/min | 11.6 km/min | Hyundai +5.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 609 PS | 299 PS | Hyundai +310 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 3.4 s | 6.2 s | Hyundai −2.8 s |
| Top speed | 260 km/h | 190 km/h | Hyundai +70 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | — | — |
| Boot | 480 l | — | — |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4715 mm | 4739 mm | Leapmotor +24 mm |
| Width | 1940 mm | 1900 mm | Hyundai +40 mm |
| Height | 1585 mm | 1680 mm | Leapmotor +95 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm | 2825 mm | Hyundai +175 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
Leapmotor C10
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
Leapmotor C10
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or Leapmotor C10?
The Leapmotor C10 goes further: 510 km WLTP against the 448 km of the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N. That is a difference of 62 km.
Why does the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Leapmotor C10?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N carries 84 kWh and covers 448 km, while the Leapmotor C10 with its 81.9 kWh battery does 510 km. Energy use decides it: 21.2 against 18 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N and the Leapmotor C10 differ?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N has AWD and 609 PS. The Leapmotor C10 has RWD and 299 PS.
Which is more powerful — Hyundai Ioniq 5 N or Leapmotor C10?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is stronger: 609 PS against the 299 PS of the Leapmotor C10. The gap is 310 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.