Elaris BEO vs Leapmotor C10
Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Leapmotor C10 180 kW · Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Leapmotor C10 299 PS · Top speed — Elaris BEO 150 km/h, Leapmotor C10 190 km/h.
Elaris BEO
The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.
Leapmotor C10
The Leapmotor C10 is an SUV in the D segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and performance specifications.
Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Leapmotor C10
- Elaris BEOStandard
Leapmotor C10Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh)
Elaris BEO or Leapmotor C10 — who wins where
Leapmotor C10 leads 5 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLeapmotor C10 +21 km
- Battery kWhElaris BEO +4.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLeapmotor C10 −1.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLeapmotor C10 +95 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hLeapmotor C10 +40 km/h
- DC charging kWLeapmotor C10 +80 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Leapmotor C10
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Elaris BEO Standard | Leapmotor C10 Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 489 km | 510 km | Leapmotor +21 km |
| Battery | 86 kWh | 81.9 kWh | Elaris +4.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.3 kWh/100 km | 18 kWh/100 km | Leapmotor −1.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 180 kW | Leapmotor +80 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 20–80% | 22 min 30–80% | 23 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.5 km/min | 11.6 km/min | Leapmotor +5.1 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 800 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 299 PS | Leapmotor +95 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 6.2 s | — |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 190 km/h | Leapmotor +40 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1955 kg | — | — |
| Boot | 467 l | — | — |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Leapmotor |
| Length | 4698 mm | 4739 mm | Leapmotor +41 mm |
| Width | 1908 mm | 1900 mm | Elaris +8 mm |
| Height | 1696 mm | 1680 mm | Elaris +16 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2800 mm | 2825 mm | Leapmotor +25 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Elaris BEO
Leapmotor C10
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Elaris BEO
Leapmotor C10
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Leapmotor C10?
The Leapmotor C10 goes further: 510 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 21 km.
Why does the Elaris BEO have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Leapmotor C10?
The Elaris BEO carries 86 kWh and covers 489 km, while the Leapmotor C10 with its 81.9 kWh battery does 510 km. Energy use decides it: 19.3 against 18 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Leapmotor C10 differ?
The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Leapmotor C10 has RWD and 299 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Leapmotor C10 — its 81.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.