Leapmotor C10 vs Xpeng G6
Biggest differences: DC charging — Leapmotor C10 180 kW, Xpeng G6 451 kW · 0–100 km/h — Leapmotor C10 6.2 s, Xpeng G6 6.7 s · Top speed — Leapmotor C10 190 km/h, Xpeng G6 202 km/h.
Leapmotor C10
The Leapmotor C10 is an SUV in the D segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and performance specifications.
Xpeng G6
The Xpeng G6 is a crossover (segment D) that offers three different powertrain options and supports fast DC charging up to 451 kW.
Profile against the market: Leapmotor C10 vs Xpeng G6
Leapmotor C10Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh)
Xpeng G6Long Range RWD
Leapmotor C10 or Xpeng G6 — who wins where
Xpeng G6 leads 4 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmXpeng G6 +15 km
- Battery kWhLeapmotor C10 +1.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmXpeng G6 −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLeapmotor C10 +3 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLeapmotor C10 −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hXpeng G6 +12 km/h
- DC charging kWXpeng G6 +271 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Leapmotor C10 vs Xpeng G6
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Leapmotor C10 Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh) | Xpeng G6 Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 510 km | 525 km | Xpeng +15 km |
| Battery | 81.9 kWh | 80 kWh | Leapmotor +1.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18 kWh/100 km | 17.5 kWh/100 km | Xpeng −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 180 kW | 451 kW | Xpeng +271 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 22 min 30–80% | 12 min 10–80% | 10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 11.6 km/min | 30.6 km/min | Xpeng +19 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 299 PS | 296 PS | Leapmotor +3 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.2 s | 6.7 s | Leapmotor −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 190 km/h | 202 km/h | Xpeng +12 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 2115 kg | — |
| Boot | — | 571 l | — |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4739 mm | 4758 mm | Xpeng +19 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1920 mm | Xpeng +20 mm |
| Height | 1680 mm | 1650 mm | Leapmotor +30 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2825 mm | 2890 mm | Xpeng +65 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Leapmotor C10
Xpeng G6
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Leapmotor C10
Xpeng G6
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Leapmotor C10 or Xpeng G6?
The Xpeng G6 goes further: 525 km WLTP against the 510 km of the Leapmotor C10. That is a difference of 15 km.
Why does the Leapmotor C10 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Xpeng G6?
The Leapmotor C10 carries 81.9 kWh and covers 510 km, while the Xpeng G6 with its 80 kWh battery does 525 km. Energy use decides it: 18 against 17.5 kWh/100 km.
Which charges faster?
The Leapmotor C10 accepts up to 180 kW DC, the Xpeng G6 up to 451 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Xpeng G6 uses less electricity: 17.5 kWh/100 km against 18 kWh/100 km in the Leapmotor C10. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.