Leapmotor C10 vs Mazda CX-6e

Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Leapmotor C10 6.2 s, Mazda CX-6e 7.9 s · Power — Leapmotor C10 299 PS, Mazda CX-6e 258 PS · DC charging — Leapmotor C10 180 kW, Mazda CX-6e 195 kW.

Leapmotor C10

The Leapmotor C10 is an SUV in the D segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and performance specifications.

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e is a D-segment SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 484 km in the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging capabilities.

Profile against the market: Leapmotor C10 vs Mazda CX-6e

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Leapmotor C10 or Mazda CX-6e — who wins where

Leapmotor C10 leads 6 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLeapmotor C10 +26 km
    Leapmotor C10
    510
    Mazda CX-6e
    484
  • Battery kWhLeapmotor C10 +3.9 kWh
    Leapmotor C10
    81.9
    Mazda CX-6e
    78
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmLeapmotor C10 −0.9 kWh/100 km
    Leapmotor C10
    18
    Mazda CX-6e
    18.9
  • Power PSLeapmotor C10 +41 PS
    Leapmotor C10
    299
    Mazda CX-6e
    258
  • 0–100 km/h sLeapmotor C10 −1.7 s
    Leapmotor C10
    6.2
    Mazda CX-6e
    7.9
  • Top speed km/hLeapmotor C10 +5 km/h
    Leapmotor C10
    190
    Mazda CX-6e
    185
  • DC charging kWMazda CX-6e +15 kW
    Leapmotor C10
    180
    Mazda CX-6e
    195
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Leapmotor C10
    11
    Mazda CX-6e
    11
  • Weight kgNo data
    Leapmotor C10
    Mazda CX-6e
    2130
  • Boot lNo data
    Leapmotor C10
    Mazda CX-6e
    363

Add a third car

Technical data: Leapmotor C10 vs Mazda CX-6e

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Leapmotor C10 vs Mazda CX-6e
Key parameters Leapmotor C10
Design Long Range RWD (81,9 kWh)
Mazda CX-6e
Takumi
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range510 km484 kmLeapmotor +26 km
Battery81.9 kWh78 kWhLeapmotor +3.9 kWh
Consumption18 kWh/100 km18.9 kWh/100 kmLeapmotor −0.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging180 kW195 kWMazda +15 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 22 min 30–80%24 min 10–80%2 min
Range per minute of charging11.6 km/min14.1 km/minMazda +2.5 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VLeapmotor +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power299 PS258 PSLeapmotor +41 PS
0–100 km/h6.2 s7.9 sLeapmotor −1.7 s
Top speed190 km/h185 km/hLeapmotor +5 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2130 kg
Boot363 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4739 mm4850 mmMazda +111 mm
Width1900 mm1935 mmMazda +35 mm
Height1680 mm1620 mmLeapmotor +60 mm
Wheelbase2825 mm2902 mmMazda +77 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Leapmotor C10

Cost per 100 km5.4
Monthly67
Yearly810

Mazda CX-6e

Cost per 100 km5.67
Monthly71
Yearly850

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Leapmotor C10

Mazda CX-6e

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Leapmotor C10 or Mazda CX-6e?

The Leapmotor C10 goes further: 510 km WLTP against the 484 km of the Mazda CX-6e. That is a difference of 26 km.

Which charges faster?

The Leapmotor C10 accepts up to 180 kW DC, the Mazda CX-6e up to 195 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Leapmotor C10 uses less electricity: 18 kWh/100 km against 18.9 kWh/100 km in the Mazda CX-6e. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 135 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.