KGM Torres EVX vs Tesla Model Y
Tesla Model Y leads 7 to 3
Biggest differences: Power — KGM Torres EVX 207 PS, Tesla Model Y 514 PS · DC charging — KGM Torres EVX 120 kW, Tesla Model Y 250 kW · 0–100 km/h — KGM Torres EVX 8.23 s, Tesla Model Y 4.6 s.
KGM Torres EVX
The KGM Torres EVX is a D-segment SUV offering a range of 503 km according to the WLTP standard, and boasts a large luggage space of 839 liters.
Tesla Model Y
The Tesla Model Y is a segment D SUV offered in four variants in the 2026 model year: WLTP range from 525 to 622 km, 0-100 km/h acceleration from 7.2 to 3.5 seconds.
Profile against the market: KGM Torres EVX vs Tesla Model Y
KGM Torres EVXTorres EVX
Tesla Model YPremium AWD
KGM Torres EVX or Tesla Model Y — who wins where
Tesla Model Y leads 7 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmTesla Model Y +119 km
- Battery kWhKGM Torres EVX +1.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmTesla Model Y −3.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSTesla Model Y +307 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sTesla Model Y −3.6 s
- Top speed km/hTesla Model Y +26 km/h
- DC charging kWTesla Model Y +130 kW
- AC charging kWTesla Model Y +0.5 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgKGM Torres EVX −72 kg
- Boot lKGM Torres EVX +17 l
Technical data: KGM Torres EVX vs Tesla Model Y
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | KGM Torres EVX Torres EVX | Tesla Model Y Premium AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 503 km | 622 km | Tesla +119 km |
| Battery | 80.6 kWh | 79 kWh | KGM +1.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.3 kWh/100 km | 15.6 kWh/100 km | Tesla −3.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 120 kW | 250 kW | Tesla +130 kW |
| AC charging | 10.5 kW | 11 kW | Tesla +0.5 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 36 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.8 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 207 PS | 514 PS | Tesla +307 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.23 s | 4.6 s | Tesla −3.6 s |
| Top speed | 175 km/h | 201 km/h | Tesla +26 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1925 kg | 1997 kg | KGM −72 kg |
| Boot | 839 l | 822 l | KGM +17 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only KGM |
| Length | 4715 mm | 4790 mm | Tesla +75 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 1920 mm | Tesla +30 mm |
| Height | 1725 mm | 1624 mm | KGM +101 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2680 mm | 2890 mm | Tesla +210 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
KGM Torres EVX
Tesla Model Y
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
KGM Torres EVX
Tesla Model Y
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — KGM Torres EVX or Tesla Model Y?
The Tesla Model Y goes further: 622 km WLTP against the 503 km of the KGM Torres EVX. That is a difference of 119 km.
Why does the KGM Torres EVX have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Tesla Model Y?
The KGM Torres EVX carries 80.6 kWh and covers 503 km, while the Tesla Model Y with its 79 kWh battery does 622 km. Energy use decides it: 19.3 against 15.6 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the KGM Torres EVX and the Tesla Model Y differ?
The KGM Torres EVX has FWD and 207 PS. The Tesla Model Y has AWD and 514 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the KGM Torres EVX — its 80.6 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Tesla Model Y, with 79 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.