KGM Torres EVX vs Xpeng G6
Xpeng G6 leads 8 to 3
Biggest differences: DC charging — KGM Torres EVX 120 kW, Xpeng G6 451 kW · Charging 10–80% — KGM Torres EVX 36 min, Xpeng G6 12 min · Boot — KGM Torres EVX 839 l, Xpeng G6 571 l.
KGM Torres EVX
The KGM Torres EVX is a D-segment SUV offering a range of 503 km according to the WLTP standard, and boasts a large luggage space of 839 liters.
Xpeng G6
The Xpeng G6 is a crossover (segment D) that offers three different powertrain options and supports fast DC charging up to 451 kW.
Profile against the market: KGM Torres EVX vs Xpeng G6
KGM Torres EVXTorres EVX
Xpeng G6Long Range RWD
KGM Torres EVX or Xpeng G6 — who wins where
Xpeng G6 leads 8 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmXpeng G6 +22 km
- Battery kWhKGM Torres EVX +0.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmXpeng G6 −1.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSXpeng G6 +89 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sXpeng G6 −1.5 s
- Top speed km/hXpeng G6 +27 km/h
- DC charging kWXpeng G6 +331 kW
- AC charging kWXpeng G6 +0.5 kW
- Charging ↓ minXpeng G6 −24 min
- Weight ↓ kgKGM Torres EVX −190 kg
- Boot lKGM Torres EVX +268 l
Technical data: KGM Torres EVX vs Xpeng G6
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | KGM Torres EVXTorres EVX | Xpeng G6Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 503 km | 525 km | Xpeng +22 km |
| Battery | 80.6 kWh | 80 kWh | KGM +0.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.3 kWh/100 km | 17.5 kWh/100 km | Xpeng −1.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 120 kW | 451 kW | Xpeng +331 kW |
| AC charging | 10.5 kW | 11 kW | Xpeng +0.5 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 36 min | 12 min | Xpeng −24 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.8 km/min | 30.6 km/min | Xpeng +20.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Xpeng +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 207 PS | 296 PS | Xpeng +89 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.23 s | 6.7 s | Xpeng −1.5 s |
| Top speed | 175 km/h | 202 km/h | Xpeng +27 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1925 kg | 2115 kg | KGM −190 kg |
| Boot | 839 l | 571 l | KGM +268 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4715 mm | 4758 mm | Xpeng +43 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 1920 mm | Xpeng +30 mm |
| Height | 1725 mm | 1650 mm | KGM +75 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2680 mm | 2890 mm | Xpeng +210 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
KGM Torres EVX
Xpeng G6
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
KGM Torres EVX
Xpeng G6
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — KGM Torres EVX or Xpeng G6?
The Xpeng G6 goes further: 525 km WLTP against the 503 km of the KGM Torres EVX. That is a difference of 22 km.
Why does the KGM Torres EVX have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Xpeng G6?
The KGM Torres EVX carries 80.6 kWh and covers 503 km, while the Xpeng G6 with its 80 kWh battery does 525 km. Energy use decides it: 19.3 against 17.5 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the KGM Torres EVX and the Xpeng G6 differ?
The KGM Torres EVX has FWD and 207 PS. The Xpeng G6 has RWD and 296 PS.
Which is more powerful — KGM Torres EVX or Xpeng G6?
The Xpeng G6 is stronger: 296 PS against the 207 PS of the KGM Torres EVX. The gap is 89 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.




