BYD Sealion 7 vs KGM Torres EVX
BYD Sealion 7 leads 8 to 3
Biggest differences: Power — BYD Sealion 7 530 PS, KGM Torres EVX 207 PS · DC charging — BYD Sealion 7 230 kW, KGM Torres EVX 120 kW · 0–100 km/h — BYD Sealion 7 4.5 s, KGM Torres EVX 8.23 s.
BYD Sealion 7
BYD Sealion 7 is a D-segment SUV in three variants: WLTP range from 456 to 502 km, power from 312 to 530 hp.
KGM Torres EVX
The KGM Torres EVX is a D-segment SUV offering a range of 503 km according to the WLTP standard, and boasts a large luggage space of 839 liters.
Profile against the market: BYD Sealion 7 vs KGM Torres EVX
BYD Sealion 7Excellence AWD
KGM Torres EVXTorres EVX
BYD Sealion 7 or KGM Torres EVX — who wins where
BYD Sealion 7 leads 8 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmKGM Torres EVX +1 km
- Battery kWhBYD Sealion 7 +10.7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBYD Sealion 7 −1.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBYD Sealion 7 +323 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBYD Sealion 7 −3.7 s
- Top speed km/hBYD Sealion 7 +40 km/h
- DC charging kWBYD Sealion 7 +110 kW
- AC charging kWBYD Sealion 7 +0.5 kW
- Charging ↓ minBYD Sealion 7 −12 min
- Weight ↓ kgKGM Torres EVX −510 kg
- Boot lKGM Torres EVX +319 l
Technical data: BYD Sealion 7 vs KGM Torres EVX
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Sealion 7Excellence AWD | KGM Torres EVXTorres EVX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 502 km | 503 km | KGM +1 km |
| Battery | 91.3 kWh | 80.6 kWh | BYD +10.7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.2 kWh/100 km | 19.3 kWh/100 km | BYD −1.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 230 kW | 120 kW | BYD +110 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 10.5 kW | BYD +0.5 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 24 min | 36 min | BYD −12 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.6 km/min | 9.8 km/min | BYD +4.8 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 530 PS | 207 PS | BYD +323 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.5 s | 8.23 s | BYD −3.7 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h | 175 km/h | BYD +40 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2435 kg | 1925 kg | KGM −510 kg |
| Boot | 520 l | 839 l | KGM +319 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only KGM |
| Length | 4830 mm | 4715 mm | BYD +115 mm |
| Width | — | 1890 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1725 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | 2930 mm | 2680 mm | BYD +250 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Sealion 7
KGM Torres EVX
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Sealion 7
KGM Torres EVX
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the BYD Sealion 7 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the KGM Torres EVX?
The BYD Sealion 7 carries 91.3 kWh and covers 502 km, while the KGM Torres EVX with its 80.6 kWh battery does 503 km. Energy use decides it: 18.2 against 19.3 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BYD Sealion 7 and the KGM Torres EVX differ?
The BYD Sealion 7 has AWD and 530 PS. The KGM Torres EVX has FWD and 207 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the KGM Torres EVX — its 80.6 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BYD Sealion 7, with 91.3 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — BYD Sealion 7 or KGM Torres EVX?
The BYD Sealion 7 is stronger: 530 PS against the 207 PS of the KGM Torres EVX. The gap is 323 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.




