Elaris BEO vs KGM Torres EVX
Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, KGM Torres EVX 50 kW · Boot — Elaris BEO 467 l, KGM Torres EVX 839 l · Battery — Elaris BEO 86 kWh, KGM Torres EVX 73.4 kWh.
Elaris BEO
The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.
KGM Torres EVX
The KGM Torres EVX is a compact SUV with front-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of 462 km thanks to its 73.4 kWh battery.
Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs KGM Torres EVX
- Elaris BEOStandard
KGM Torres EVXTorres EVX
Elaris BEO or KGM Torres EVX — who wins where
KGM Torres EVX leads 5 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmElaris BEO +27 km
- Battery kWhElaris BEO +12.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmKGM Torres EVX −1.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSKGM Torres EVX +3 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hKGM Torres EVX +25 km/h
- DC charging kWElaris BEO +50 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgKGM Torres EVX −40 kg
- Boot lKGM Torres EVX +372 l
Technical data: Elaris BEO vs KGM Torres EVX
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Elaris BEO Standard | KGM Torres EVX Torres EVX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 489 km | 462 km | Elaris +27 km |
| Battery | 86 kWh | 73.4 kWh | Elaris +12.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.3 kWh/100 km | 17.7 kWh/100 km | KGM −1.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 50 kW | Elaris +50 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | 45 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.5 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 207 PS | KGM +3 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 8.11 s | — |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 175 km/h | KGM +25 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1955 kg | 1915 kg | KGM −40 kg |
| Boot | 467 l | 839 l | KGM +372 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only KGM |
| Length | 4698 mm | 4715 mm | KGM +17 mm |
| Width | 1908 mm | 1890 mm | Elaris +18 mm |
| Height | 1696 mm | 1725 mm | KGM +29 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2800 mm | 2680 mm | Elaris +120 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Elaris BEO
KGM Torres EVX
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Elaris BEO
KGM Torres EVX
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or KGM Torres EVX?
The Elaris BEO goes further: 489 km WLTP against the 462 km of the KGM Torres EVX. That is a difference of 27 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the KGM Torres EVX — its 73.4 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The KGM Torres EVX takes more: 839 l against 467 l in the Elaris BEO. The difference is 372 l.
Which charges faster?
The Elaris BEO accepts up to 100 kW DC, the KGM Torres EVX up to 50 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.