Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Subaru Uncharted
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 11 kW, Subaru Uncharted 22 kW · Boot — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 535 l, Subaru Uncharted 403 l · Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, Subaru Uncharted 224 PS.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different drive variants with varying power outputs and ranges.
Subaru Uncharted
The Subaru Uncharted is an SUV in the C segment, offering three different drive configurations with varying ranges and performance, from 451 km to 592 km in the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Subaru Uncharted
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron45
Subaru Uncharted77 kWh FWD
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Subaru Uncharted — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmSubaru Uncharted +19 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSubaru Uncharted −1.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +62 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −0.6 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +20 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +25 kW
- AC charging kWSubaru Uncharted +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −2 min
- Weight ↓ kgSubaru Uncharted −154 kg
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +132 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Subaru Uncharted
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | Subaru Uncharted 77 kWh FWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 592 km | Subaru +19 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 77 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 13.8 kWh/100 km | Subaru −1.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 175 kW | 150 kW | Audi +25 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Subaru +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 30 min | Audi −2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 13.8 km/min | Audi +0.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 224 PS | Audi +62 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 7.3 s | Audi −0.6 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | Audi +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2070 kg | 1916 kg | Subaru −154 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 403 l | Audi +132 l |
| Length | 4588 mm | 4535 mm | Audi +53 mm |
| Width | 1865 mm | 1870 mm | Subaru +5 mm |
| Height | 1614 mm | 1625 mm | Subaru +11 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | 2750 mm | Audi +14 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Subaru Uncharted
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Subaru Uncharted
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Subaru Uncharted?
The Subaru Uncharted goes further: 592 km WLTP against the 573 km of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. That is a difference of 19 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Subaru Uncharted differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Subaru Uncharted has FWD and 224 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron takes more: 535 l against 403 l in the Subaru Uncharted. The difference is 132 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 175 kW DC, the Subaru Uncharted up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 30 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.