Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Subaru Uncharted
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 2
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 11 kW, Subaru Uncharted 22 kW · Boot — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 527 l, Subaru Uncharted 403 l · Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, Subaru Uncharted 224 PS.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Subaru Uncharted
The Subaru Uncharted is an SUV in the C segment, offering three different drive configurations with varying ranges and performance, from 451 km to 592 km in the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Subaru Uncharted
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
Subaru Uncharted77 kWh FWD
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Subaru Uncharted — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmSubaru Uncharted +16 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −0.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +62 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −0.7 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +20 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +15 kW
- AC charging kWSubaru Uncharted +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +124 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Subaru Uncharted
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance | Subaru Uncharted77 kWh FWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 592 km | Subaru +16 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 77 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 13.8 kWh/100 km | Audi −0.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 150 kW | Audi +15 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Subaru +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 30 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 13.8 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 224 PS | Audi +62 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.3 s | Audi −0.7 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | Audi +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 1916 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 403 l | Audi +124 l |
| Length | — | 4535 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1870 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1625 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2750 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Subaru Uncharted
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Subaru Uncharted
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tronvs
Volvo EX40
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tronvs
Volvo EC40
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tronvs
Škoda Elroq
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tronvs
Lancia Gamma
Subaru Unchartedvs
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Subaru Unchartedvs
Volvo EC40
Subaru Unchartedvs
Kia EV3
Subaru Unchartedvs
Škoda Elroq
Subaru Unchartedvs
Lancia GammaFrequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Subaru Uncharted?
The Subaru Uncharted goes further: 592 km WLTP against the 576 km of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. That is a difference of 16 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Subaru Uncharted differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Subaru Uncharted has FWD and 224 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron takes more: 527 l against 403 l in the Subaru Uncharted. The difference is 124 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Subaru Uncharted up to 150 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.