Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Renault Scenic
Biggest differences: Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, Renault Scenic 220 PS · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 6.7 s, Renault Scenic 7.9 s · DC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 175 kW, Renault Scenic 150 kW.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different drive variants with varying power outputs and ranges.
Renault Scenic
The electric SUV in the C-segment offers two drive variants with different battery capacities and motor power.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Renault Scenic
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron45
Renault ScenicLong Range 87 kWh
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Renault Scenic — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmRenault Scenic +51 km
- Battery kWhRenault Scenic +10 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +66 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +25 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Scenic −217 kg
- Boot lRenault Scenic +10 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Renault Scenic
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | Renault Scenic Long Range 87 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 624 km | Renault +51 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 87 kWh | Renault +10 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 16.9 kWh/100 km | Audi −1.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 175 kW | 150 kW | Audi +25 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 28 min 10–80% | 37 min 15–80% | 9 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 11 km/min | Audi +3.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 220 PS | Audi +66 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 7.9 s | Audi −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2070 kg | 1853 kg | Renault −217 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 545 l | Renault +10 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Renault |
| Length | 4588 mm | 4470 mm | Audi +118 mm |
| Width | 1865 mm | 1864 mm | Audi +1 mm |
| Height | 1614 mm | 1571 mm | Audi +43 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | 2785 mm | Renault +21 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Renault Scenic
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Renault Scenic
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Renault Scenic?
The Renault Scenic goes further: 624 km WLTP against the 573 km of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. That is a difference of 51 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Renault Scenic differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Renault Scenic has FWD and 220 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Renault Scenic — its 87 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 175 kW DC, the Renault Scenic up to 150 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.