Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Omoda E5
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 0
Biggest differences: Boot — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 527 l, Omoda E5 300 l · Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, Omoda E5 211 PS · WLTP range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 576 km, Omoda E5 430 km.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Omoda E5
The Omoda E5 is an SUV in the C segment with front-wheel drive and a 61 kWh battery.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Omoda E5
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
Omoda E5E5
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Omoda E5 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 8 to 0
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +146 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +16 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −2.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +75 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +9 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +35 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +227 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Omoda E5
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | Omoda E5 E5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 430 km | Audi +146 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 61 kWh | Audi +16 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 130 kW | Audi +35 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 30–80% ↓ | — | 28 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 7.7 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 211 PS | Audi +75 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.6 s | Audi −1 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 171 km/h | Audi +9 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 1710 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 300 l | Audi +227 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Omoda |
| Length | — | 4424 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1830 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1588 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2630 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Omoda E5
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Omoda E5
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Omoda E5?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 430 km of the Omoda E5. That is a difference of 146 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Omoda E5 differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Omoda E5 has FWD and 211 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Omoda E5 — its 61 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Omoda E5?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is stronger: 286 PS against the 211 PS of the Omoda E5. The gap is 75 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.