Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 11 kW, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22 kW · Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 218 PS · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 6.7 s, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 8.4 s.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different drive variants with varying power outputs and ranges.
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Long Range is a compact SUV with front-wheel drive and a long driving range according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron45
Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossLong Range 87 kWh FWD
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +27 km
- Battery kWhMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +10 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1.7 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +25 kW
- AC charging kWMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgMitsubishi Eclipse Cross −228 kg
- Boot lMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +10 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Long Range 87 kWh FWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 600 km | Mitsubishi +27 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 87 kWh | Mitsubishi +10 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 16.7 kWh/100 km | Audi −1.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 175 kW | 150 kW | Audi +25 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Mitsubishi +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 32 min | Audi −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 13.1 km/min | Audi +1.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 218 PS | Audi +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 8.4 s | Audi −1.7 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2070 kg | 1842 kg | Mitsubishi −228 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 545 l | Mitsubishi +10 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Mitsubishi |
| Length | 4588 mm | 4470 mm | Audi +118 mm |
| Width | 1865 mm | 1864 mm | Audi +1 mm |
| Height | 1614 mm | 1571 mm | Audi +43 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | — | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross goes further: 600 km WLTP against the 573 km of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. That is a difference of 27 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has FWD and 218 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross — its 87 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 175 kW DC, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 32 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.