Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 5 to 4
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 11 kW, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22 kW · Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 218 PS · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 6.6 s, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 8.4 s.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Long Range is a compact SUV with front-wheel drive and a long driving range according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossLong Range 87 kWh FWD
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 5 to 4
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +24 km
- Battery kWhMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +10 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −3.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1.8 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +15 kW
- AC charging kWMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +18 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Long Range 87 kWh FWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 600 km | Mitsubishi +24 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 87 kWh | Mitsubishi +10 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 16.7 kWh/100 km | Audi −3.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 150 kW | Audi +15 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Mitsubishi +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 32 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 13.1 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 218 PS | Audi +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 8.4 s | Audi −1.8 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 1842 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 545 l | Mitsubishi +18 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Mitsubishi |
| Length | — | 4470 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1864 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1571 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | — | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross goes further: 600 km WLTP against the 576 km of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. That is a difference of 24 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has FWD and 218 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross — its 87 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross up to 150 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.