Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Changan Deepal S05
Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 28 min, Changan Deepal S05 23 min · WLTP range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 573 km, Changan Deepal S05 488 km · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 6.7 s, Changan Deepal S05 7.5 s.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different drive variants with varying power outputs and ranges.
Changan Deepal S05
The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Changan Deepal S05
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Changan Deepal S05 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +85 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +8.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −0.8 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +7 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minChangan Deepal S05 −5 min
- Weight ↓ kgChangan Deepal S05 −130 kg
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +43 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Changan Deepal S05
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron45 | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 488 km | Audi +85 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 68.8 kWh | Audi +8.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 15.9 kWh/100 km | Audi −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 175 kW | 168 kW | Audi +7 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 23 min | Changan −5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 14.9 km/min | Changan +0.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 272 PS | Audi +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 7.5 s | Audi −0.8 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2070 kg | 1940 kg | Changan −130 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 492 l | Audi +43 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Changan |
| Length | 4588 mm | 4598 mm | Changan +10 mm |
| Width | 1865 mm | 1900 mm | Changan +35 mm |
| Height | 1614 mm | 1600 mm | Audi +14 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | 2880 mm | Changan +116 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Changan Deepal S05
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Changan Deepal S05
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Changan Deepal S05?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 488 km of the Changan Deepal S05. That is a difference of 85 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S05 — its 68.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 175 kW DC, the Changan Deepal S05 up to 168 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 23 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron uses less electricity: 15.4 kWh/100 km against 15.9 kWh/100 km in the Changan Deepal S05. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.