Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Changan Deepal S05
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 1
Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 165 kW, Changan Deepal S05 200 kW · Consumption — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 13.4 kWh/100 km, Changan Deepal S05 15.9 kWh/100 km · WLTP range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 576 km, Changan Deepal S05 488 km.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Changan Deepal S05
Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in two variants: the RWD Max with a WLTP range of 488 km and the AWD Max with 435 hp.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Changan Deepal S05
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Changan Deepal S05 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +88 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +8.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −2.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −0.9 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +35 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +35 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Changan Deepal S05
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 488 km | Audi +88 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 68.8 kWh | Audi +8.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 15.9 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 200 kW | Changan +35 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 23 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 14.9 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 272 PS | Audi +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.5 s | Audi −0.9 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 1940 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 492 l | Audi +35 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Changan |
| Length | — | 4598 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1900 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1600 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2880 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Changan Deepal S05
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Changan Deepal S05
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Changan Deepal S05?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 488 km of the Changan Deepal S05. That is a difference of 88 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S05 — its 68.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Changan Deepal S05 up to 200 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron uses less electricity: 13.4 kWh/100 km against 15.9 kWh/100 km in the Changan Deepal S05. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 375 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.