Alpine A290 vs Nissan Micra
It's a tie: 3 to 3
Biggest differences: Power — Alpine A290 180 PS, Nissan Micra 150 PS · WLTP range — Alpine A290 380 km, Nissan Micra 416 km · 0–100 km/h — Alpine A290 7.4 s, Nissan Micra 8 s.
Alpine A290
Alpine A290 is an electric B-segment hatchback offering two drivetrain variants with power from 180 hp to 220 hp.
Nissan Micra
The Nissan Micra (Model Year 2026) is a compact, segment B hatchback available with two different range and power configurations, offering front-wheel drive.
Profile against the market: Alpine A290 vs Nissan Micra
Alpine A290GT
Nissan Micra52 kWh
Alpine A290 or Nissan Micra — who wins where
It's a tie: 3 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNissan Micra +36 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNissan Micra −1.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAlpine A290 +30 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAlpine A290 −0.6 s
- Top speed km/hAlpine A290 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgNissan Micra −31 kg
- Boot lNo difference
Technical data: Alpine A290 vs Nissan Micra
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Alpine A290 GT | Nissan Micra 52 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 380 km | 416 km | Nissan +36 km |
| Battery | 52 kWh | 52 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.8 kWh/100 km | 14.7 kWh/100 km | Nissan −1.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 15–80% ↓ | 30 min | 30 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 8.2 km/min | 9 km/min | Nissan +0.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 180 PS | 150 PS | Alpine +30 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.4 s | 8 s | Alpine −0.6 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 150 km/h | Alpine +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1483 kg | 1452 kg | Nissan −31 kg |
| Boot | 326 l | 326 l | No difference |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 3997 mm | 3974 mm | Alpine +23 mm |
| Width | 1823 mm | 1774 mm | Alpine +49 mm |
| Height | 1512 mm | 1499 mm | Alpine +13 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2534 mm | 2541 mm | Nissan +7 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Alpine A290
Nissan Micra
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Alpine A290
Nissan Micra
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Alpine A290 or Nissan Micra?
The Nissan Micra goes further: 416 km WLTP against the 380 km of the Alpine A290. That is a difference of 36 km.
Which charges faster?
The Alpine A290 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Nissan Micra up to 100 kW. Charging from 15 to 80% takes 30 and 30 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Nissan Micra uses less electricity: 14.7 kWh/100 km against 15.8 kWh/100 km in the Alpine A290. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 165 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.