Škoda Epiq vs Suzuki e Vitara

Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Škoda Epiq 24 min, Suzuki e Vitara 45 min · Boot — Škoda Epiq 475 l, Suzuki e Vitara 306 l · DC charging — Škoda Epiq 105 kW, Suzuki e Vitara 70 kW.

Škoda Epiq

The Škoda Epiq is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering three different motor configurations and battery capacities.

Suzuki e Vitara

An electric SUV in the B segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Škoda Epiq vs Suzuki e Vitara

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Škoda Epiq or Suzuki e Vitara — who wins where

Škoda Epiq leads 9 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Epiq +15 km
    Škoda Epiq
    441
    Suzuki e Vitara
    426
  • Battery kWhSuzuki e Vitara +9 kWh
    Škoda Epiq
    52
    Suzuki e Vitara
    61
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Epiq −1.4 kWh/100 km
    Škoda Epiq
    13.7
    Suzuki e Vitara
    15.1
  • Power PSŠkoda Epiq +37 PS
    Škoda Epiq
    211
    Suzuki e Vitara
    174
  • 0–100 km/h sŠkoda Epiq −1.6 s
    Škoda Epiq
    7.1
    Suzuki e Vitara
    8.7
  • Top speed km/hŠkoda Epiq +10 km/h
    Škoda Epiq
    160
    Suzuki e Vitara
    150
  • DC charging kWŠkoda Epiq +35 kW
    Škoda Epiq
    105
    Suzuki e Vitara
    70
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Škoda Epiq
    11
    Suzuki e Vitara
    11
  • Charging minŠkoda Epiq −21 min
    Škoda Epiq
    24
    Suzuki e Vitara
    45
  • Weight kgŠkoda Epiq −292 kg
    Škoda Epiq
    1543
    Suzuki e Vitara
    1835
  • Boot lŠkoda Epiq +169 l
    Škoda Epiq
    475
    Suzuki e Vitara
    306

Add a third car

Technical data: Škoda Epiq vs Suzuki e Vitara

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Škoda Epiq vs Suzuki e Vitara
Key parameters Škoda Epiq
55
Suzuki e Vitara
61 kWh 2WD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range441 km426 kmŠkoda +15 km
Battery52 kWh61 kWhSuzuki +9 kWh
Consumption13.7 kWh/100 km15.1 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −1.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging105 kW70 kWŠkoda +35 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%24 min45 minŠkoda −21 min
Range per minute of charging12.9 km/min6.6 km/minŠkoda +6.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power211 PS174 PSŠkoda +37 PS
0–100 km/h7.1 s8.7 sŠkoda −1.6 s
Top speed160 km/h150 km/hŠkoda +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1543 kg1835 kgŠkoda −292 kg
Boot475 l306 lŠkoda +169 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4171 mm4275 mmSuzuki +104 mm
Width1798 mm1800 mmSuzuki +2 mm
Height1581 mm1635 mmSuzuki +54 mm
Wheelbase2601 mm2700 mmSuzuki +99 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Škoda Epiq

Cost per 100 km4.11
Monthly51
Yearly616

Suzuki e Vitara

Cost per 100 km4.53
Monthly57
Yearly679

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Škoda Epiq

Suzuki e Vitara

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Škoda Epiq or Suzuki e Vitara?

The Škoda Epiq goes further: 441 km WLTP against the 426 km of the Suzuki e Vitara. That is a difference of 15 km.

Why does the Suzuki e Vitara have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Škoda Epiq?

The Suzuki e Vitara carries 61 kWh and covers 426 km, while the Škoda Epiq with its 52 kWh battery does 441 km. Energy use decides it: 15.1 against 13.7 kWh/100 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Epiq takes more: 475 l against 306 l in the Suzuki e Vitara. The difference is 169 l.

Which charges faster?

The Škoda Epiq accepts up to 105 kW DC, the Suzuki e Vitara up to 70 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 24 and 45 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.