Suzuki e Vitara vs Volvo EX30

Biggest differences: DC charging — Suzuki e Vitara 70 kW, Volvo EX30 175 kW · Charging 10–80% — Suzuki e Vitara 45 min, Volvo EX30 27 min · 0–100 km/h — Suzuki e Vitara 8.7 s, Volvo EX30 5.3 s.

Suzuki e Vitara

An electric SUV in the B segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.

Profile against the market: Suzuki e Vitara vs Volvo EX30

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Suzuki e Vitara or Volvo EX30 — who wins where

Volvo EX30 leads 9 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVolvo EX30 +49 km
    Suzuki e Vitara
    426
    Volvo EX30
    475
  • Battery kWhVolvo EX30 +8 kWh
    Suzuki e Vitara
    61
    Volvo EX30
    69
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmSuzuki e Vitara −1.9 kWh/100 km
    Suzuki e Vitara
    15.1
    Volvo EX30
    17
  • Power PSVolvo EX30 +98 PS
    Suzuki e Vitara
    174
    Volvo EX30
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sVolvo EX30 −3.4 s
    Suzuki e Vitara
    8.7
    Volvo EX30
    5.3
  • Top speed km/hVolvo EX30 +30 km/h
    Suzuki e Vitara
    150
    Volvo EX30
    180
  • DC charging kWVolvo EX30 +105 kW
    Suzuki e Vitara
    70
    Volvo EX30
    175
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Suzuki e Vitara
    11
    Volvo EX30
    11
  • Charging minVolvo EX30 −18 min
    Suzuki e Vitara
    45
    Volvo EX30
    27
  • Weight kgVolvo EX30 −60 kg
    Suzuki e Vitara
    1835
    Volvo EX30
    1775
  • Boot lVolvo EX30 +12 l
    Suzuki e Vitara
    306
    Volvo EX30
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: Suzuki e Vitara vs Volvo EX30

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Suzuki e Vitara vs Volvo EX30
Key parameters Suzuki e Vitara
61 kWh 2WD
Volvo EX30
P5 Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range426 km475 kmVolvo +49 km
Battery61 kWh69 kWhVolvo +8 kWh
Consumption15.1 kWh/100 km17 kWh/100 kmSuzuki −1.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging70 kW175 kWVolvo +105 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%45 min27 minVolvo −18 min
Range per minute of charging6.6 km/min12.3 km/minVolvo +5.7 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power174 PS272 PSVolvo +98 PS
0–100 km/h8.7 s5.3 sVolvo −3.4 s
Top speed150 km/h180 km/hVolvo +30 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1835 kg1775 kgVolvo −60 kg
Boot306 l318 lVolvo +12 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Suzuki
Length4275 mm4233 mmSuzuki +42 mm
Width1800 mm1837 mmVolvo +37 mm
Height1635 mm1549 mmSuzuki +86 mm
Wheelbase2700 mm2650 mmSuzuki +50 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Suzuki e Vitara

Cost per 100 km4.53
Monthly57
Yearly679

Volvo EX30

Cost per 100 km5.1
Monthly64
Yearly765

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Suzuki e Vitara

Volvo EX30

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Suzuki e Vitara or Volvo EX30?

The Volvo EX30 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 426 km of the Suzuki e Vitara. That is a difference of 49 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Suzuki e Vitara and the Volvo EX30 differ?

The Suzuki e Vitara has FWD and 174 PS. The Volvo EX30 has RWD and 272 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Suzuki e Vitara — its 61 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volvo EX30, with 69 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Suzuki e Vitara or Volvo EX30?

The Volvo EX30 is stronger: 272 PS against the 174 PS of the Suzuki e Vitara. The gap is 98 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.