Suzuki e Vitara vs Toyota Urban Cruiser

Biggest differences: DC charging — Suzuki e Vitara 70 kW, Toyota Urban Cruiser 67 kW.

Suzuki e Vitara

An electric SUV in the B segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.

Toyota Urban Cruiser

The Toyota Urban Cruiser is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering three different motor configurations and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Suzuki e Vitara vs Toyota Urban Cruiser

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Suzuki e Vitara or Toyota Urban Cruiser — who wins where

Suzuki e Vitara leads 2 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmNo difference
    Suzuki e Vitara
    426
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    426
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Suzuki e Vitara
    61
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    61
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmNo difference
    Suzuki e Vitara
    15.1
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    15.1
  • Power PSNo difference
    Suzuki e Vitara
    174
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    174
  • 0–100 km/h sNo difference
    Suzuki e Vitara
    8.7
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    8.7
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Suzuki e Vitara
    150
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    150
  • DC charging kWSuzuki e Vitara +3 kW
    Suzuki e Vitara
    70
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    67
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Suzuki e Vitara
    11
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    11
  • Charging minNo difference
    Suzuki e Vitara
    45
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    45
  • Weight kgSuzuki e Vitara −4 kg
    Suzuki e Vitara
    1835
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    1839
  • Boot lToyota Urban Cruiser +4 l
    Suzuki e Vitara
    306
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    310

Add a third car

Technical data: Suzuki e Vitara vs Toyota Urban Cruiser

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Suzuki e Vitara vs Toyota Urban Cruiser
Key parameters Suzuki e Vitara
61 kWh 2WD
Toyota Urban Cruiser
61 FWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range426 km426 kmNo difference
Battery61 kWh61 kWhNo difference
Consumption15.1 kWh/100 km15.1 kWh/100 kmNo difference
Charging
DC charging70 kW67 kWSuzuki +3 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%45 min45 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging6.6 km/min6.6 km/minNo difference
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power174 PS174 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h8.7 s8.7 sNo difference
Top speed150 km/h150 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1835 kg1839 kgSuzuki −4 kg
Boot306 l310 lToyota +4 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Suzuki
Length4275 mm4285 mmToyota +10 mm
Width1800 mm1800 mmNo difference
Height1635 mm1635 mmNo difference
Wheelbase2700 mm2700 mmNo difference

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Suzuki e Vitara

Cost per 100 km4.53
Monthly57
Yearly679

Toyota Urban Cruiser

Cost per 100 km4.53
Monthly57
Yearly679

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Suzuki e Vitara

Toyota Urban Cruiser

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Suzuki e Vitara — its 61 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Toyota Urban Cruiser, with 61 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The Suzuki e Vitara accepts up to 70 kW DC, the Toyota Urban Cruiser up to 67 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 45 and 45 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.